The Gay Manifesto – including the first line.

The  authors  at  : http://www.ralliance.org/GayAgenda.html  accuse  “the  Christian 

Right”  of  deliberately  misrepresenting  what  is  supposed  to  be  a  satirical  piece 

written  by  Michael  Swift  for  Gay Community News, and  published  Feb. 15-21, 1987.  

The  Christian  Right  is  accused  of  deliberately  leaving  out  the  first  line  which 

places  the  rest  of the  item  in context.

The  full  piece  -  including  the  first  line –   is  below.

 

 

Gay Community News, Feb. 15-21, 1987

(From the Congressional Record, with preface restored [restored preface in blue])

This essay is an outré, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage, on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor.

We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.

Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep. Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of with men. Then go and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never known because we are foremost men too, and only one man knows how to truly please another man; only one man can understand the depth and feeling, the mind and body of another man.

All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men.

All homosexuals must stand together as brothers; we must be united artistically, philosophically, socially, politically and financially. We will triumph only when we present a common face to the vicious heterosexual enemy.

If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your cowardly hearts and defile your dead, puny bodies.

We shall write poems of the love between men; we shall stage plays in which man openly caresses man; we shall make films about the love between heroic men which will replace the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently dominating your cinema screens. We shall sculpt statues of beautiful young men, of bold athletes which will be placed in your parks, your squares, your plazas. The museums of the world will be filled only with paintings of graceful, naked lads.

Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles. We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through usage of the devices of wit and ridicule, devices which we are skilled in employing.

We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be. We are everywhere; we have infiltrated your ranks. Be careful when you speak of homosexuals because we are always among you; we may be sitting across the desk from you; we may be sleeping in the same bed with you.

There will be no compromises. We are not middle-class weaklings. Highly intelligent, we are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for less. Those who oppose us will be exiled.

We shall raise vast private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.

The family unit-spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy and violence–will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants.

All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only gods are handsome young men. We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and esthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar and banal will be annihilated. Since we are alienated from middle-class heterosexual conventions, we are free to live our lives according to the dictates of the pure imagination. For us too much is not enough.

The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets. One of the major requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will be indulgence in the Greek passion. Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be automatically barred from a position of influence. All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men.

We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions. We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have shaped the world. We will demonstrate that homosexuality and intelligence and imagination are inextricably linked, and that homosexuality is a requirement for true nobility, true beauty in a man.

We shall be victorious because we are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the oppressed who have been forced to play seemingly bit parts in your dumb, heterosexual shows throughout the ages. We too are capable of firing guns and manning the barricades of the ultimate revolution.

Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks.

“Same – sex marriage” in Jamaica – some considerations

 

The  following  is from an interview  with  the  editors  and  reporters  of  the  Jamaica  Observer  on May 21st, 2012

 

UNAIDS, “Homophobia” and the Buggery Law

Much  of  what  UNAIDS  Caribbean Director, Dr. Ernest Massiah  says  below  is  true  and  should  be  given  a  sympathetic  ear  however the  director  gets  it  wrong   in   at  least  two  places :

1.   ” we don’t make an issue of the tall or short ones, …….”   This  is  true  but  we  certainly  reserve  the  right  to  take  issue  with  some  of  the  things  they  do .

2. The  suggestion  that  disagreeing   with    persons’   sexual  orientation  and  the  acting  out  of   their  sexual  orientation   implies  fear  of  those  individuals  is  simply  not  true.   

The  director  is  right  ” All  Caribbean  people  are  equal”   however   the  actions  of  Caribbean  peoples  are  not all   equal.

 The  scientific  facts  are  that  around  the world  the  intimate  actions  of   Men  who  have  Sex  with  Men  (MSM)  are  placing  these  individuals  in grave  danger .

 

http://unaidscaribbean.org/node/255

All Caribbean people are equal

Submitted by admin on Thu, 05/17/2012 – 20:44 – 0 Comments

A message from UNAIDS Caribbean Director, Dr. Ernest Massiah, on the International Day against Homophobia and Transphobia (IDAHO) 2012.

Many of us have someone in our families who is gay.  Or bisexual. Similarly, we have family members who are tall. Or short. But we don’t make an issue of the tall or short ones, or hide to talk about them. No, we give them funny nicknames—Tall Boy, Shorty, Miss Tiny. We use our language to convey humour and acceptance.  But we hide the fact that we know that someone close to us is gay or bisexual.  It becomes the obvious secret. We show our fear and unease with our expressions, our words and our hush.

May 17th is the International Day against Homophobia and Transphobia (IDAHO).  Phobia is a fancy word for fear.  When applied to people, phobia is a fear of people. Homophobia is the fear of people who are lesbian, gay or bisexual.  Transphobia is the fear of people whose biological sex doesn’t line up with the gender they feel inside.

We are afraid of these differences. This makes us fearful of our own loved ones. It is a fear of who they love, with whom they are intimate and how they express their identity. It is a fear that moves us to avoid, attack, or reject family members who we have grown up with and loved.  It is a fear we need to overcome in much the same way we’ve confronted our phobias about differences of race, colour and gender.

In schools across the Caribbean we teach children the concepts of justice and equity.  However, at home, in the street and in the school yard, our children hear a different story. They hear old tales and fears. We teach them prejudice.

This is just like in the old days when skin colour, hair texture, where you lived, who your parents were, and if you were male or female meant that you could be denied a job, a place in school or entry to certain clubs. We have developed as a people but there are still phobias that we must address. Homophobia is one of them.

Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people are our sisters and brothers, daughters and sons, mothers and fathers, neighbours and members of our churches, mosques and temples. They are teachers, judges, politicians, policemen and women, soldiers, boys on the block, and sports personalities. They are on TV and radio. They live in town and in the country. They are no less deserving of the protections, services and opportunities that our Caribbean societies offer to all citizens.

In many of our countries, except the Bahamas, there are old nineteenth century “buggery” laws. These laws feed the prejudice, violence and lack of protection from law enforcement that gay and bisexual people often experience.

We sometimes point to members of the gay lesbian bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community who live fulfilling lives, citing this as evidence of our tolerance. The true test of our humanity is our willingness to accept all members of our family and those on the margins.  That means we must we stop throwing gay and bisexual youth out of their homes.  We must stop abusing transgender people. Our hospitals, clinics, police services and laws must now respond to the needs of LGBT people.

Leadership on these issues has begun to emerge in our region. During the December 2011 Jamaica general election that she would go on to win, Portia Simpson Miller called for a conscience vote on anti-gay laws.

In March, Trinidad and Tobago agreed at the United Nation’s Universal Periodic Review to “increase measures to ensure that violence and discrimination against… lesbians, gay, bisexual, and transgender persons, are both prevented and prosecuted”.

And in April the Guyana government announced a series of national consultations on whether legislation that discriminates against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people should be reformed.

Over time some people change their minds about these issues. As we have seen from our experience of race and class prejudice, others do not. Today’s commemoration of IDAHO is an acknowledgement that whatever one’s personal position on homosexuality or gender, there are universal and Caribbean standards that all people must be treated with dignity and respect.  We are all equal and are therefore equally entitled to the protection and services of the state as well as the humanity and respect of our fellow man.

Photo Caption: Dr. Ernest Massiah, UNAIDS Caribbean Regional Support Team Director (Credit: UNAIDS Caribbean)

Support of anal sex more important than Christian values for child rearing in modern Britain

 

Support of anal sex  trumps  Christianity  for child rearing in modern Britain

Posted on May 19, 2012 by testifyingtotruth

Support of anal sex  may   to  be  the  most important criterion for child rearing in modern Britain.

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Anti-gay-couple-barred

Anti-gay couple barred

England stops Jamaican-born Christians from fostering 16th child

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

A Jamaican-born British couple say they have been told they can’t foster a 16th child in their Derby County home, because as Christians they don’t believe homosexuality is right.

Owen and Eunice Johns, who are back home in Jamaica, are preparing to take the matter before the European Court of Justice with the support of a coalition of Christian groups who are firmly opposed to the gay and lesbian lifestyle.

JOHNS… gays have more rights than Christians (Photo: Garfield Robinson)

JOHNS… gays have more rights than Christians (Photo: Garfield Robinson) 1/1

“These people (gays) have more rights than Christians. We have been called retarded homophobics because we want to stand up for the truth,” Eunice Johns, a retired nurse who hails from Trelawny, said in an interview with the Jamaica Observer yesterday.

Johns appeared at joint press conference with the Jamaica Coalition for a Healthy Society, the Jamaica Association of Evangelicals and the Roman Catholic Family to highlight what they suggested was a “secular agenda” in the fight against HIV/AIDS epidemic.

The group, which consists of several influential Christian leaders, reaffirmed their objections to the lifestyle practised by gays and lesbians.

The Johns have been foster parents to 15 Jamaican children since they started taking children into their home in England in 1992. All went well, they said, until they went back to the Derby City Council to foster a 16th child in 2006.

“They started asking about my Christianity and I told them I was a Christian, I go to church on a Sunday. I told them I was a Bible-believing Christian,” Eunice said.

She was asked: “What if a child of five came to you one day from school and told you that they were homosexual?” To this she responded: “I would care for that child, I would give them love and attention and all that’s required.”

Her response, however, did not find favour with the social worker and when Eunice ventured to ask what her response should have been, she was told: “You would have to tell this child that it is alright to be homosexual.”

Failing to convince Eunice to change her mind on the matter, the social worker said she would have to raise the issue with her manager. Two weeks later the manager came to see her.

“She said to us: ‘Well, Mr and Mrs Johns, we were told that you said you could not tell a child it is alright to be homosexual, and in this day and age you would have to because so many children are not sure where they are and a lot of them are confused. So many people are confused these days, because they weren’t told that their sexuality and what they are feeling is right’.”

She said she and her husband were then taken before a panel of 12 persons at the Council where they were asked to explain their views on homosexuality. Two weeks after that, they got a letter thanking them for withdrawing their application to foster children. The couple were shocked, because they had made no such request. However, they decided not to contest the Council on the matter.

“After they said, ‘thank you for withdrawing’, we said ‘that’s alright, we would leave it, no skin off our nose, perhaps we shouldn’t foster’,” she recalled.

But just a few weeks later, they learnt of another couple whose foster child was taken away because they refused to tell them that homosexuality was right, she added.

After the passage of The Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations of 2007, Johns said they began hearing of Christians who were being prosecuted for denouncing the gay lifestyle. Several Christian children’s homes had been closed, Christian pastors were being abused, and several Christian business owners were forced to close because they decided to affirm their belief. Christian marriage counsellors were also coming under increased pressure because of their refusal to marry same-sex couples, she claimed.

The Johns’ case eventually attracted the attention of the Christian Concern for Our Nation, a religious lobby group in London. Their solicitors took the matter before the Nottingham Crown Court in 2009. Following months of court appearances by the Johns, their lawyers, representatives of the Derby City Council, and civil rights group, the High Court, in a landmark ruling in 2010, noted that laws protecting gays from discrimination superceded the couple’s religious belief.

“The judge did not say we could not foster children, but the judge was saying England is no longer a Christian country, it’s now a secular country. He made it quite clear that we have got to adhere to what is being set out,” said Eunice, who came back to Jamaica five months ago with her husband.

Their solicitors are now preparing to take the matter before the European Court of Justice, Johns said, adding that Jamaica was in a good position to refute what she believed was a hidden agenda by the Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual and Transgender community.

“I notice the word that they are using here while trying to push this thing through is tolerance. We are Christians, so we should be tolerant. But it only takes that first door and it’s like a domino effect, all of the other doors are going to be opened,” she said.

Read more: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Anti-gay-couple-barred#ixzz1vMjVulZf

Support of anal sex the most important criterion for child rearing in modern Britain ?

Support of anal sex  may   to  be  the  most important criterion for child rearing in modern Britain.

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Anti-gay-couple-barred

Anti-gay couple barred

England stops Jamaican-born Christians from fostering 16th child

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

A Jamaican-born British couple say they have been told they can’t foster a 16th child in their Derby County home, because as Christians they don’t believe homosexuality is right.

Owen and Eunice Johns, who are back home in Jamaica, are preparing to take the matter before the European Court of Justice with the support of a coalition of Christian groups who are firmly opposed to the gay and lesbian lifestyle.

JOHNS… gays have more rights than Christians (Photo: Garfield Robinson)

JOHNS… gays have more rights than Christians (Photo: Garfield Robinson) 1/1

“These people (gays) have more rights than Christians. We have been called retarded homophobics because we want to stand up for the truth,” Eunice Johns, a retired nurse who hails from Trelawny, said in an interview with the Jamaica Observer yesterday.

Johns appeared at joint press conference with the Jamaica Coalition for a Healthy Society, the Jamaica Association of Evangelicals and the Roman Catholic Family to highlight what they suggested was a “secular agenda” in the fight against HIV/AIDS epidemic.

The group, which consists of several influential Christian leaders, reaffirmed their objections to the lifestyle practised by gays and lesbians.

The Johns have been foster parents to 15 Jamaican children since they started taking children into their home in England in 1992. All went well, they said, until they went back to the Derby City Council to foster a 16th child in 2006.

“They started asking about my Christianity and I told them I was a Christian, I go to church on a Sunday. I told them I was a Bible-believing Christian,” Eunice said.

She was asked: “What if a child of five came to you one day from school and told you that they were homosexual?” To this she responded: “I would care for that child, I would give them love and attention and all that’s required.”

Her response, however, did not find favour with the social worker and when Eunice ventured to ask what her response should have been, she was told: “You would have to tell this child that it is alright to be homosexual.”

Failing to convince Eunice to change her mind on the matter, the social worker said she would have to raise the issue with her manager. Two weeks later the manager came to see her.

“She said to us: ‘Well, Mr and Mrs Johns, we were told that you said you could not tell a child it is alright to be homosexual, and in this day and age you would have to because so many children are not sure where they are and a lot of them are confused. So many people are confused these days, because they weren’t told that their sexuality and what they are feeling is right’.”

She said she and her husband were then taken before a panel of 12 persons at the Council where they were asked to explain their views on homosexuality. Two weeks after that, they got a letter thanking them for withdrawing their application to foster children. The couple were shocked, because they had made no such request. However, they decided not to contest the Council on the matter.

“After they said, ‘thank you for withdrawing’, we said ‘that’s alright, we would leave it, no skin off our nose, perhaps we shouldn’t foster’,” she recalled.

But just a few weeks later, they learnt of another couple whose foster child was taken away because they refused to tell them that homosexuality was right, she added.

After the passage of The Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations of 2007, Johns said they began hearing of Christians who were being prosecuted for denouncing the gay lifestyle. Several Christian children’s homes had been closed, Christian pastors were being abused, and several Christian business owners were forced to close because they decided to affirm their belief. Christian marriage counsellors were also coming under increased pressure because of their refusal to marry same-sex couples, she claimed.

The Johns’ case eventually attracted the attention of the Christian Concern for Our Nation, a religious lobby group in London. Their solicitors took the matter before the Nottingham Crown Court in 2009. Following months of court appearances by the Johns, their lawyers, representatives of the Derby City Council, and civil rights group, the High Court, in a landmark ruling in 2010, noted that laws protecting gays from discrimination superceded the couple’s religious belief.

“The judge did not say we could not foster children, but the judge was saying England is no longer a Christian country, it’s now a secular country. He made it quite clear that we have got to adhere to what is being set out,” said Eunice, who came back to Jamaica five months ago with her husband.

Their solicitors are now preparing to take the matter before the European Court of Justice, Johns said, adding that Jamaica was in a good position to refute what she believed was a hidden agenda by the Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual and Transgender community.

“I notice the word that they are using here while trying to push this thing through is tolerance. We are Christians, so we should be tolerant. But it only takes that first door and it’s like a domino effect, all of the other doors are going to be opened,” she said.

Read more: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Anti-gay-couple-barred#ixzz1vMjVulZf

” Hate” – YouTube pulls plug on homosexuality exposé

The following  is  the  beginning  of  an  article  which  may  be  seen  at :

http://www.wnd.com/2012/05/youtube-pulls-plug-on-homosexuality-expose/?cat_orig=faith

“A ministry that opposes the advocacy for homosexual “marriage” in the United States took the opportunity of Barack Obama’s endorsement of the idea recently to create a video that documents changes that could be advancing on the United States in coming years: A real-time look at what already is standard practice in Canada where same-sex marriage was legitimized several years ago.

For that, the ministry was accused of “hate” and YouTube pulled down the documentary-type video”.

The  video  itself  may be seen   below.

?cat_orig=faith#ooid=FwMG1wNDrctwt1QXlwI93gvUUSxv2NQg

Homophobia, Transphobia and “rights” to deadly behaviour

A)

http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/media_center/PReleases/2012/051.asp

Press Release

IACHR Urges States to End Homophobia and Transphobia

May 17, 2012

Share this Press Release

ShareThis – Compartir

Contact Info

María Isabel Rivero
IACHR Press Director
Tel. (1) 202 458 3867
mrivero@oas.org

Washington, D.C. – On the International Day against Homophobia and Transphobia, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) urges states to adopt and implement the steps necessary to eradicate discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.

The Commission notes that some of the region’s countries have made legislative progress in relation to gender identity, one of the main demands of trans women and men; others have taken steps forward with the adoption of antidiscrimination laws. The IACHR commends this progress and urges States to take it further, in light of their obligation to ensure equality before the law and eradicate discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity.

The Commission continues to receive information on killings, torture, arbitrary arrests, and other forms of violence and exclusion against lesbians, gays, and trans, bisexual, and intersex persons. In addition, the Commission notes that problems exist in the investigation of those crimes, which involve, in part, failures to open lines of investigation into whether the crime was committed by reason of the victim’s gender identity or sexual orientation. The ineffectiveness of the justice system fosters high rates of impunity, which in turn lead to the chronic repetition of such crimes, leaving the victims and their families in a state of absolute defenselessness.

The IACHR also expresses its concern about laws criminalizing homosexuality and gender expressions such as the use of attire traditionally associated with the opposite sex, and about the consequences that such legislation can have on the full enjoyment of human rights.

The IACHR urges the states of the Americas to take action to prevent and respond to these human rights abuses and to ensure that LGTBI people can effectively enjoy their right to a life free of discrimination and violence, including the adoption of policies and public campaigns and the amendments necessary to bring their laws into line with the inter-American instruments on human rights. The Commission places itself at the disposal of the States to assist, in accordance with its functions, in progressing toward that goal.

A principal, autonomous body of the Organization of American States (OAS), the IACHR derives its mandate from the OAS Charter and the American Convention on Human Rights. The Inter-American Commission has a mandate to promote respect for human rights in the region and acts as a consultative body to the OAS in this area. The IACHR is composed of seven independent members who are elected in an individual capacity by the OAS General Assembly.

 

No. 51/12

 

B)

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011 Dec 1;58(4):408-16.

Men who have sex with men have a 140-fold higher risk for newly diagnosed HIV and syphilis compared with heterosexual men in New York City.

Pathela P, Braunstein SL, Schillinger JA, Shepard C, Sweeney M, Blank S.

Source

Bureau of Sexually Transmitted Disease Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York City, NY, USA. ppathela@health.nyc.gov

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

To describe the population of men who have sex with men (MSM) in New York City, compare their demographics, risk behaviors, and new HIV and primary and secondary (P&S) syphilis rates with those of men who have sex with women (MSW), and examine trends in infection rates among MSM.

DESIGN:

Population denominators and demographic and behavioral data were obtained from population-based surveys during 2005-2008. Numbers of new HIV and P&S syphilis diagnoses were extracted from city-wide disease surveillance registries.

METHODS:

We calculated overall, age-specific and race/ethnicity-specific case rates and rate ratios for MSM and MSW and analyzed trends in MSM rates by age and race/ethnicity.

RESULTS:

The average prevalence of male same-sex behavior during 2005-2008 (5.0%; 95% CI: 4.5 to 5.6) differed by both age and race/ethnicity (2.3% among non-Hispanic black men; 7.4% among non-Hispanic white men). Compared with MSW, MSM differed significantly on all demographics and reported a higher prevalence of condom use at last sex (62.9% vs. 38.3%) and of past-year HIV testing (53.6% vs. 27.2%) but also more past-year sex partners. MSM HIV and P&S syphilis rates were 2526.9/100,000 and 707.0/100,000, each of which was over 140 times MSW rates. Rates were highest among young and black MSM. Over 4 years, HIV rates more than doubled and P&S syphilis rates increased 6-fold among 18-year-old to 29-year-old MSM.

CONCLUSIONS:

The substantial population of MSM in New York City is at high risk for acquisition of sexually transmitted infections given high rates of newly diagnosed infections and ongoing risk behaviors. Intensified and innovative efforts to implement and evaluate prevention programs are required.

 

 

C)

AIDS Behav. 2011 Apr;15 Suppl 1:S9-17.

Sexual health, HIV, and sexually transmitted infections among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in the United States.

Wolitski RJ, Fenton KA.

Source

Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton RD NE (E-35), Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. RWolitski@cdc.gov

Abstract

The sexual health of gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States is not getting better despite considerable social, political and human rights advances. Instead of improving, HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) remain disproportionately high among MSM and have been increasing for almost two decades. The disproportionate and worsening burden of HIV and other STIs among MSM requires an urgent re-assessment of what we have been doing as a nation to reduce these infections, how we have been doing it, and the scale of our efforts. A sexual health approach has the potential to improve our understanding of MSM’s sexual behavior and relationships, reduce HIV and STI incidence, and improve the health and well-being of MSM.

PMID:

21331797