The Bottom Line : The secular UK’s moral compass ?

Both major politics; parties in the UK have expressed their commitment to prioritise LGBT   “rights” overseas. These “rights” go beyond the human rights all citizens have to include  privacy “rights” to fisting, felching, farming, scat,anal penetration etc.

One cannot but wonder if “the Bottom Line” has become the now secular  UK’s substantial moral compass.

 

xxxx  E N D S  xxxxx

http://www.tht.org.uk/mediacentre/pressreleases/2003/january2003/thebottomline.htm

20 January 2003

The Bottom Line – all you’ll ever need to know about your arse

Ever been curious about prostates, the male G-spot, buttock exercises or douching? The latest booklet from THT explains all about these and more. Whether you want to learn more about how to enjoy anal sex, or have questions about the health of your posterior, The Bottom Line is for you.

Richard Scholey from THT’s Gay Men’s Health Promotion team said: “The booklet is designed to cover everything a gay man needs to know about enjoying and looking after his arse and the arse of anyone he’s having sex with. It covers a wide variety of topics, and we’ve used a mixture of illustrations and graphics to explain more about how the arse works, what it does, how it relates to other parts of the body and how you can make sure you and your partners get maximum pleasure from the arse.”

The Bottom Line continues the theme of THT’s current advertisements in the gay press which highlighted the facts about anal sex and HIV transmission. Topics include:

what’s inside your arse
different sexual activities involving the arse
taking things up the arse, from sex toys and douches to real life cocks and fists
anal health problems, including piles, constipation, rectal STIs and fissures
prostate awareness
exercise and eating for better anal health

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Your friendly neighbour secularist believes that MSM have a privacy right to felching (aka slurping) which trumps your rights to freedom of speech.

 

“The remedy for speech that is false is speech that is true. This is the ordinary course in a free society. The response to the unreasoned is the rational; to the uninformed, the enlightened; to the straight-out lie, the simple truth”.

…  Judge Anthony  Kennedy….
United States v. Alvarez, 567 U. S. ____, *16 (2012).

 

Secularists  are  becoming  or  have  become  the  dominant  philosophers  of public  policy in countries  like  the  USA, UK, France, Canada  etc.

These intellectuals  are  aware of  the  concept  of  competing rights so  the  unfolding  legislative  commitment  in  western democracies   is  that  “privacy rights” to  fisting, felching (aka slurping) , farming  etc  must  trump  a  parents’s  right to  tell  their  children what  is  right and  what  is  wrong.  They also trump  freedom of  speech.

Secularists  are  using  the  concept  of  ‘privacy” rights  to impose  their values  on children through  education curricula.  They are  also  deliberately  silencing  opposition    by curtailing freedom of  speech  against  the LGBT  agenda.

The  fascist  Gaystapo LGBT  agenda  is  clearly  shown  in the article  below

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

http://www.hardcell.org.uk/en/playroom/felching/

What is felching?

Felching is sucking (usually your own) cum out of someone’s arse, possibly with a straw. It may then include passing the spunk from mouth to mouth.

What’s the attraction?

Many of us are drawn towards tasting or swallowing cum (our own or others). It can mean taking into the body something seen as valued and potent.

Felching can also signify the end of the sex act. This meaning is even stronger if the cum’s been inside the other man as it’s a strong sign of two men joining together in a very intimate, ‘no limits’ way.

A strong, ‘piggy’ erotic charge comes from breaking the taboos around cleanliness and health that come with taking into your mouth something that’s been up another man’s arse.

 

xxxx  E  N D  S  xxxx

 

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Jamaican-born-British-college-lecturer-suspended-for-homophobic-comments

 

Walcott

Jamaican-born British college lecturer suspended for homophobic comments

Thursday, November 28, 2013 | 1:38 PM

KINGSTON, Jamaica — A London college lecturer, who is said to be a Jamaican native, has been suspended over homophobic remarks he made during a staffroom discussion that was secretly recorded.

Fifty-two-year-old Dr Mark Walcott is reported to have compared gay teachers to the Ku Klux Klan and also claimed that gay teachers are obsessed with converting pupils to ‘gayism’, the London Evening Standard reports.

 

Dr Walcott the head of dance and drama at London’s Newham College and a part-time psychotherapist, is reported to have made the comments in a 50-minute secretly recorded video.

The Standard reports that he told stunned colleagues: “Boys are becoming gay not because they have got a gay gene but because they have gay teachers. The homosexual stimuli is out there moulding and grooming our children.”

His remarks were reportedly made last year but the video has now been posted online after appalled staff claimed their concerns were “swept under the carpet” when the college’s eight-month investigation resulted in no action being taken.

The Standard reported that after the recording was listened to more than 2,000 times on YouTube, the board of governors yesterday held an emergency meeting, resulting in Dr Walcott being suspended from his role as a consultant at the college.

The governors are said to be concerned about the quality of the initial investigation, and are believed to have chosen an external “legal heavyweight” to chair a new inquiry, the Standard reports.

The Standard says Newham is one of London’s largest further education colleges with more than 20,000 full- and part-time students.

Read more: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Jamaican-born-British-college-lecturer-suspended-for-homophobic-comments#ixzz2m0LpOX61

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Of the fascist gaystapo UK state, gay genes and gay boys.

 

“The remedy for speech that is false is speech that is true. This is the ordinary course in a free society. The response to the unreasoned is the rational; to the uninformed, the enlightened; to the straight-out lie, the simple truth”.

…  Judge Anthony  Kennedy….
United States v. Alvarez, 567 U. S. ____, *16 (2012).

 

The UK  appears  to  be a   fascist Gaystapo state  which  is aggressively restricting freedom of  speech  whilst at  the  same time seeking  to  impose “rights” to same sex activity  such as anal penetration, fisting, felching ( aka slurping), jackhammering and chariot racing  on countries  around  the  world.

The Jamaica Observer reports  on the fascist Gaystapo activities  of  the  UK regime.

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

http://www.hardcell.org.uk/en/playroom/felching/

What is felching?

Felching is sucking (usually your own) cum out of someone’s arse, possibly with a straw. It may then include passing the spunk from mouth to mouth.

What’s the attraction?

Many of us are drawn towards tasting or swallowing cum (our own or others). It can mean taking into the body something seen as valued and potent.

Felching can also signify the end of the sex act. This meaning is even stronger if the cum’s been inside the other man as it’s a strong sign of two men joining together in a very intimate, ‘no limits’ way.

A strong, ‘piggy’ erotic charge comes from breaking the taboos around cleanliness and health that come with taking into your mouth something that’s been up another man’s arse.

 

xxxx  E  N D  S  xxxx

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Jamaican-born-British-college-lecturer-suspended-for-homophobic-comments

 

Walcott

Jamaican-born British college lecturer suspended for homophobic comments

Thursday, November 28, 2013 | 1:38 PM

KINGSTON, Jamaica — A London college lecturer, who is said to be a Jamaican native, has been suspended over homophobic remarks he made during a staffroom discussion that was secretly recorded.

Fifty-two-year-old Dr Mark Walcott is reported to have compared gay teachers to the Ku Klux Klan and also claimed that gay teachers are obsessed with converting pupils to ‘gayism’, the London Evening Standard reports.

 

Dr Walcott the head of dance and drama at London’s Newham College and a part-time psychotherapist, is reported to have made the comments in a 50-minute secretly recorded video.

The Standard reports that he told stunned colleagues: “Boys are becoming gay not because they have got a gay gene but because they have gay teachers. The homosexual stimuli is out there moulding and grooming our children.”

His remarks were reportedly made last year but the video has now been posted online after appalled staff claimed their concerns were “swept under the carpet” when the college’s eight-month investigation resulted in no action being taken.

The Standard reported that after the recording was listened to more than 2,000 times on YouTube, the board of governors yesterday held an emergency meeting, resulting in Dr Walcott being suspended from his role as a consultant at the college.

The governors are said to be concerned about the quality of the initial investigation, and are believed to have chosen an external “legal heavyweight” to chair a new inquiry, the Standard reports.

The Standard says Newham is one of London’s largest further education colleges with more than 20,000 full- and part-time students.

Read more: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Jamaican-born-British-college-lecturer-suspended-for-homophobic-comments#ixzz2m0LpOX61

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fifth columnist functional atheist Archbishop Desmond Tutu serves his purpose.

 

“Woe to those who call evil good  and good evil,
who put darkness for light and light for darkness,
who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter”.

….  Isaiah 5:20….

When  the  United  Nations  launched  its recent  “gay rights”  campaign  it  sought  out  functional  atheist and  fifth  columnist  Archbishop  Desmond  Tutu’s  endorsement  in order  to  counter  the  claims  of  true  Christianity.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-23464694

Like all  false  prophets  the  Archbishop  calls  wrong  right  and  right  wrong  and  like all false prophets he  is serving  the objectives  of  his  master.

Archbishop Tutu’s active  support  and  justification of  homosexuality  is  to  be  distinguished from  that of  the Catholic  Church  for  example  which condemns  homosexuality  but does not  believe  that  buggery  should  be criminalised.

Woe  to  the Archbishop !

“Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels”….Matt 25 :41

xxxxx  E N D S  xxxxx

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20140925/letters/letters3.html

Check Your Facts
Published: Thursday | September 25, 2014 0 Comments
THE EDITOR, Sir: Parris Brown made some very simplistic and erroneous arguments in his letter to the editor published on September 24, (‘Butt out of Buggery Debate, Mr Robinson’). Permit me to address them:

1) Homosexuality should be illegal because of Judaeo-Christian morality. FALSE: There is no single Judaeo-Christian view of homo-sexuality, and many practi-tioners, including Archbishop Desmond Tutu, support the human rights of homosexuals. Even the Catholic Church supports decriminalising sodomy. Finally, Judaeo-Christian morality was once used to support immoral practices such as slavery.

2) Homosexuality is unnatural because only opposite-sex body parts “fit”. FALSE: This reasoning quite literally reduces humans to our genitals. The fact is, we are much more than what we carry between our legs, and our sexuality is just one expression of our desire for intimacy. That is why persons who are incapable of sex, such as some disabled individuals, are allowed to marry.

3) Homosexuality spreads HIV, especially in countries without anti-sodomy laws. FALSE: Jamaica has an anti-sodomy law and has the highest HIV prevalence rate among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the Western Hemisphere – 33 per cent.

4) Homosexuals are not attracted to women and so they won’t get married to mask their sexual orientation. FALSE: Many gay men, including me, married women to ‘cure’ our homosexuality. However, we often had to think about other men in order to be intimate with females. The need for this mental infidelity is not fair to either partner.

MAURICE TOMLINSON

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

There is a difference ! : when depravity is “normal” its great to be different !

 

The different Azusa Pacific Men’s Chorale

 

xxxxxxxxxxx

 

Normal  Secularists 

Toronto  Gay Pride

London Pride 2

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

When depravity is “normal” its great to be “different”

 

The different Azusa Pacific Men’s Chorale

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxx

Normal secularists

14194001087_db9aaeeb74_z

2230568

1377358904-copenhagen-gay-pride-parade-2013_2490923

Gay Pride San Francisco

NYC76899

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

A boneheaded piece and a fitting response

 

“Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad”

…..Euripides….

 

The following is  an article which appeared in  the  Jamaica Gleaner today , 21st September  2014,  and a response to  the article in the online comments section.  

 

First, the response :

rational • 4 hours ago
It is no coincidence that Men who have Sex with Men (MSM) are the only group among whom HIV epidemics are expanding regardless of the income levels of countries studied. (Lancet 2012)

98% of the difference in HIV rates between MSM and heterosexuals is due to anal receptive intercourse and role reversal in MSM networks. (Lancet 2012)

HIV epidemics among MSM are described as “seem to be out of control”, “exploding”, “a crisis”, ” high and increasing” – and these terms are used in countries without buggery laws.

It is ironic and indeed laughable therefore that the author of this piece is framing the practice of buggery as a just cause similar to efforts for national independence .
6 • Reply•Share ›

 

The boneheaded piece

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20140921/focus/focus1.html

The War Has Just Begun

Published: Sunday | September 21, 2014

 

GayM20140904JB

Gordon Robinson, Columnist

Unsurprisingly, persons, especially those whose lives are surrendered to religious dogma, comprehensively fail to grasp the meaning of ‘privacy’.

Take Peter Espeut (please). Here’s a man against whom nobody could attribute anything but kindness of heart, spirit and intent. He also benefited from the best education available anywhere, namely, a 1960s Campion College schooling. During that period, when Campion was the laughing stock of Jamaican secondary schools for refusing to prioritise sports over academics, Campion students were taught to think independently.

Jesuits, who made up the overwhelming majority of Campion’s teacher population together with a smattering of the very best local pedagogues, insisted on being questioned, rewarded argument from students with reasoned reply, and encouraged independent thought.

So I know Peter had a great start in life educationally, which only proves how powerful church doctrine can be. Because, decades later, in the context of commentary on the Javed Jaghai claim that the ‘buggery law’ is unconstitutional, this was his expressed understanding of privacy:

“On May 2, 2014, I filed an affidavit … rebutting Jaghai’s 2013 claim. In paragraph 8, I refuted Jaghai’s claim that Jamaica’s so-called buggery laws violate his right to privacy. I argued the right to privacy doesn’t confer the right to break the law in private; if so, then one could commit murder in private with impunity. The right to privacy protects the sanctity of a person’s home, but it doesn’t permit illegal acts to be done in the privacy of one’s home. Jaghai misunderstands the meaning of the ‘right to privacy’ in the Jamaican Constitution, and this claim would have been thrown out.”

I’ll excuse Peter, as a legal layman, his belief that one can argue in an affidavit. No affidavit is allowed to include any argument nor can it ‘refute’ anybody’s claim. Affidavits contain only facts known to affiants. Claims are refuted when judges, with counsel’s assistance, apply the law to facts either agreed between/among the parties or found by judges.

Facile statements like “the right to privacy doesn’t confer the right to break the law in private” are like teaching kindergarten students, by rote, that one plus one equals two. That’s correct, BUT does any teacher explain “what’s a two”? It’s nothing more than an arbitrary method of adding up quantities only valid until a better system is invented. In the meantime, traditional counting (one-two-three … ) is functional only up to nine (we’ve only nine ‘numbers’), so man invented a way to start all over again by placing zero to nine beside the original numbers (in sets of 10) in order to be able to count any quantity. So that 10 (1+0) is really a repeat of 1; 11 (1+1) is really a repeat of 2, and so on.

Similarly, “the right to privacy doesn’t confer the right to break the law in private” is convenient, but the real question is, ‘What’s the law?’ Legal systems based on written constitutions limit lawmakers in what can be made ‘law’. If they exceed constitutional limits, the law may ‘pass’ but, as soon as an independent judiciary gets hold of it, it’ll no longer be ‘law’. One of Jamaica’s fundamental constitutional limits on lawmakers is: “Parliament shall pass no law and no organ of the State shall take any action which abrogates, abridges or infringes … the right of everyone to … :

(ii) respect for, and protection of, private and family life, and privacy of the home; and

(iii) protection of privacy of other property and of communication.”

Jaghai’s claim would NOT have been thrown out because “Jaghai misunderstands the meaning of the ‘right to privacy’ in the Jamaican Constitution … .” That ‘right to privacy’ would expressly prevent today’s Parliament from passing the ‘buggery law’ and any prosecution under that law would be unlawful. The many other offences created by the Offences against the Person Act don’t infringe on anyone’s privacy since they involve acts of violence against persons who don’t consent.

Selective religious dogma

The only difference between the attempted criminalisation of anal penetration and any attempt to criminalise vaginal penetration is the nature of the sex act, but both are (usually) done in private. Any attempt to criminalise either would be a savage invasion of the privacy of those consenting adults engaging in private sex acts. Non-reproductive vaginal sex with a consenting adult isn’t a crime, but rape of the same woman is. All anal penetration is criminal and the sole basis for the discrimination is selective religious dogma.

The ‘buggery law’ is without doubt an unjust law that, if passed today, would be struck down by our courts as unconstitutional. It’s a silly, ignorant, useless invasion of privacy of a significant percentage of humanity. It’s silly and useless because it can’t prevent the perpetual daily practice of the act criminalised. It’s ignorant because it turns a blind eye to the social consequences of forcing homosexuals to remain in the closet. This results in many marrying unsuspecting women with devastating results. I can’t believe any woman would support this intolerant dogma, which is a double-edged sword so destructive of the health and spirit of so many women.

As Lord Gifford pointed out in his excellent, balanced review of the Jaghai case, the reason Jaghai was fighting an uphill battle had nothing to do with a misunderstanding of privacy but only because the powerful, blinkered religious lobby succeeded in bullying Parliament to include the following savings clause in the Charter of Rights:

“Nothing contained in or done under the authority of any law in force immediately before the commencement of the Charter … , relating to

(a) sexual offences;

(b) obscene publications; or

(c) offences regarding the life of the unborn,

shall be held to be inconsistent with or in contravention of … this chapter.”

So, under pressure from the religiously righteous, Parliament decided to specifically exclude ‘sexual’ offences created by any previous law from the constitutional protection to privacy. Anal penetration is only an ‘offence’ because an archaic law, specifically saved from judicial scrutiny by a cowardly Parliament, says so. In every other context, including that of some heterosexual couples in their own bedroom, it’s simply another way of expressing love.

Constitutions are creatures of the society in which they exist and subject to flux as society itself evolves. This ‘savings clause’ itself was introduced by constitutional amendment. It can be removed by exactly the same process when Jamaican society matures and catches up with the rest of the world. Based on the same bigoted biblical bollocks, women (not men) were once put to death for adultery. Jamaica has matured so that adultery isn’t a crime. Pioneers like Javed Jaghai needn’t feel their brave efforts have come to naught. In Jamaica, the war against homophobia has just begun.

After Oliver Cromwell’s 17th-century invasion of Scotland during which 3,000 Scots were slaughtered and 10,000 imprisoned, the seat of Scottish government was eventually passed to London in 1707, thus dethroning the Stuarts. Bonnie Prince Charlie, rightful successor to the Scottish throne but for the English takeover, started the first Jacobite uprising in 1745, supported by Highland clans. It was obliterated by the redcoats in the 1746 Battle of Culloden. An interesting factoid: More Scots fought for the British in that battle than for Scotland.

The Stuarts never regained the Scottish throne. Prince Charlie, who fled the battlefield, lived the remainder of his life in exile in France where he tried in vain to gain support for his cause; conducted a string of affairs; and drank excessively. Bonnie Prince Charlie grew old, ugly and embittered. He died aged 67, fat and alcoholic.

But the struggle continued. Robert Burns’ poems, written in Scottish dialect, were pivotal to Scots retaining their identity. Recently, celebrities like Sean Connery have lobbied relentlessly for Scottish independence. Eventually, the English conceded a referendum. Panic-stricken, last-minute whining and begging by traditionalists like Piers Morgan and David Cameron resulted, again, in more Scots voting with England than against. But, more than 1.4 million voted for separation, ensuring the end of Westminster’s status quo and more autonomy for Scotland’s Parliament.

Don’t despair at lost battles. Time is on the side of just causes. Victory comes in increments.

Peace and love.

Gordon Robinson is an attorney-at-law. Email feedback to columns@gleanerjm.com.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment