The UK : an “utterly fascist, utterly Stalinist” , anti-free speech, thought policing, bigoted , gaystapo state with anti-christian animus.

 

 

 

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/uk-is-hostile-to-christianity-says-nursery-worker-who-claims-she-was-fired-over-views-on-homosexuality-10081324.htm

UK ‘hostile to Christianity’, says London nursery worker who claims she was fired over views on homosexuality

 

SarahMbuyiTribunal

 

 

n evangelical Christian who claims she was fired from her job at a nursery because of her views on homosexuality believes there is “state-sponsored hostility” to her religion in the UK, a tribunal heard today.

In an official statement, Belgian national Sarah Mbuyi said there was an “attitude of disrespect” for religion in Britain that makes it worse than many other European Union countries.

The Tottenham woman was dismissed for gross misconduct in January 2014 by Newpark Childcare in Shepherds Bush for harassing a married lesbian colleague by telling her her sexual orientation was a “sin”. She denies harassment, claiming that the gay woman approached her asking about religion and same-sex marriage.

In her statement to her employment tribunal in Watford, Ms Mbuyi said she enjoyed living in the UK after but added: “However, the clear (it feels, state-sponsored) hostility to Christian values means that the UK is considerably worse than many other EU member states in relation to freedom of religion.

“There is a feeling in the UK that Christianity does not need to be respected and can be disparaged. With other faiths there is extreme sensitivity from employers. This attitude of disrespect is very strange; this would not occur in Belgium and I cannot understand why the UK displays such Christian animus.”

She added: “As a Christian I try to be kind and considerate; I am conscious of the need to act in a manner appropriate to my faith. As a citizen I have as many rights to discuss my faith as any other subject, such as politics or sexuality.”

The devout Christian, who said she takes her views on homosexuality and marriage from the Bible, is fighting her sacking for breaching the family-owned Montessori nursery’s equality rules, claiming that in doing so it breached European law.

She accuses the lesbian, who cannot be named for legal reasons, of approaching her and asking about her faith and church, and saying it was “unfair” she had not been able to marry her partner in a church.

Under cross examination at the tribunal today Ms Mbuyi denied commenting on her colleague’s lifestyle without being asked.

The nursery’s barrister, Deshpal Panesar, said: “You volunteered that her sexual orientation was a sin, didn’t you?”

Ms Mbuyi replied: “No, that is wrong. I said that I can’t tell you that God is ok with that. But I also said that he can’t hate you because of it, because he doesn’t.”

Mr Panesar then asked: “You felt the need to confront her because of her sin?”

She replied: “No, she chose to confront me.”

The tribunal, which is due to last until Thursday, continues.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Atheism : Of talking zombies and uncalibrated brains.

Professing to be wise, they became fools,

…..Romans  1: 22….

 

Science has not and cannot bury God. What science is about to do however is bury the nonsense of atheism.

Atheist philosopher Thomas Nagel may be beginning to get a clue of the absolute nonsense that atheism is.

A little  reflection will  show  why atheism is the dregs of human philosophy/ reasoning …. more foolish than any religion.

Firstly  in their  world  view  atheists  will  have  to  be  fully determined  by  the nature  of  matter  and  the  laws  of  physics  as  such they cannot  have free  will  or produce  thoughts  of  their  own volition.  They are  therefore effectively  zombies  i.e  functioning  under  another’s  control.   

Secondly science  involves  measurements  of natural  phenomena.  In order  to  make  measurements  scientists  use  instruments  and  if  instruments  are  to  be  reliable they  must  be  calibrated. 

The talking zombies (atheists) who  claim  to  be  the  fountains  of  reason and  logic, believe that the brain which in their world view is an accident of nature (nonsense of course) and therefore uncalibrated – for who would calibrate it – could derive truth about the universe.

How could the  brain of  talking zombies be capable of determining truth when the instrument itself is not calibrated  ?    What Stupidity !

 

 

 

OzzZhX-__400x400

Professor Richard  Dawkins –  a talking  zombie

 

“The denier that ID [intelligent design] is science faces the following dilemma. Either he admits that the intervention of such a designer is possible, or he does not. If he does not, he must explain why that belief is more scientific than the belief that a designer is possible. If on the other hand he believes that a designer is possible, then he can argue that the evidence is overwhelmingly against the actions of such a designer, but he cannot say that someone who offers evidence on the other side is doing something of a fundamentally different kind. All he can say about that person is that he is scientifically mistaken.”

― Thomas Nagel

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Atheism : Of talking zombies and uncalibrated brains.

Atheism is the dregs of human philosophy/ reasoning …. more foolish than any religion. 

…..Testifyingtotruth….

 

Science has not and cannot bury God. What science is about to do however is bury the nonsense of atheism.

Atheist philosopher Thomas Nagel may be beginning to get a clue of the absolute nonsense that atheism is.

A little  reflection will  show  why atheism is the dregs of human philosophy/ reasoning …. more foolish than any religion.

Firstly  in their  world  view  atheists  will  have  to  be  fully determined  by  the nature  of  matter  and  the  laws  of  physics  as  such they cannot  have free  will  or produce  thoughts  of  their  own volition.  They are  therefore effectively  zombies  i.e  functioning  under  another’s  control.   

 

The talking zombies believe that the brain, which in their world view is an accident of nature (nonsense of course) and therefore uncalibrated – for who would calibrate it – could derive truth about the universe.

How could the  brain of  talking zombies be capable of determining truth when the instrument itself is not calibrated. What Stupidity !

 

 

 

OzzZhX-__400x400

Professor Richard  Dawkins –  a talking  zombie

 

“The denier that ID [intelligent design] is science faces the following dilemma. Either he admits that the intervention of such a designer is possible, or he does not. If he does not, he must explain why that belief is more scientific than the belief that a designer is possible. If on the other hand he believes that a designer is possible, then he can argue that the evidence is overwhelmingly against the actions of such a designer, but he cannot say that someone who offers evidence on the other side is doing something of a fundamentally different kind. All he can say about that person is that he is scientifically mistaken.”

― Thomas Nagel

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The SECULAR WAR ON CHILDREN : children’s “right” to have sex as they choose

 

New Living Translation
“The rich man had to admire the dishonest rascal for being so shrewd. And it is true that the children of this world are more shrewd in dealing with the world around them than are the children of the light.

….. Luke 16:8…..

There can be little doubt that one of the objectives of some who embrace the secular / atheist world view is to make adult sex with children “normal” under the law.

This is identical to the concept that LGBTTTIQ …. etc and gender fluidity are to be considered normal under the law.

The strategy being used to achieve this is identical to the LGBTTTIQ strategy i.e using a “rights-based ” approached.

A part of this strategy is to claim that children are sexual beings essentially from birth (this based on the so-called scientific work of Alfred Kinsey) and as such have a “right to sex as they choose”.

It would appear that one of the approaches being used to sexualise children to facilitate this “rights-based” approach is by using sex education curricula. 

 

 

 

http://www.campaignlifecoalition.com/index.php?p=Sex_Ed_curriculum

 

Ontario’s Radical Sex Ed Curriculum

UPDATE FEBRUARY 25, 2015: On February 23rd the Liberal government finally posted the new sex-ed curriculum online. The sudden change in plans by the Wynne government, which had previously said the curriculum would not be made availabe online for several more weeks, unveiled it the day before a planned protest at Queen’s Park. Getting ahead of the story that a parental protest could generate was a likely motivation by the Wynne government. But an even more important reason for Kathleen Wynne to finally allow the public to see it, is that it allowed her to government to change the channel on allegations of criminal conduct by her and the Liberal Party in which it was determined that the Liberals broke the law by allegedly “bribing” a candidate to stay out of the by-election in exchange for a plumb position in government. Now the media is talking about sex-ed and not the Kathleen Wynne government’s alleged criminal activity.

CLC has studied the 2015 proposed curriculum and we have found that the controversial elements of the program that angered parents in 2010 have remained unchanged, almost word for word, at the same age-inappropriate grade levels as before, when it was written under the direction of confessed child pornographer Benjamin Levin, then Deputy Education Minister. The only difference now is that Kathleen Wynne has made the curriculum even more explicit and more age-inappropriate than before, dramatically increasing the mentions of “Gender Identity” theory, sexual “identities” and “orientations”. Anal intercourse is still being presented in a way that students will interpret as carrying no higher risk than vaginal intercourse, an irresponsible and misleading presentation of the former which carries a 3000% higher risk for contracting HIV. The curriculum also downplays the seriousness of contracting HIV, potentially leaving the impression with students that it’s not really that big a deal. It seems to have a political undertone of making it acceptable and normal for HIV positive people to continue being sexually active. That’s not science. It’s political and social engineering.

The curriculum has added a new controversial theory to be taught to elementary school children “gender expression”. The new curriculum document also has a much stronger undertone of sex as a purely recreational activity whose purpose is pleasure, apart from love or marriage. In fact, the words “love” and “marriage” never appear once in the sex-education strands of the curriculum. Not a single mention.

The curriculum document also encourages the use of condoms and artificial birth control to prevent pregnancy and STDs. There is also a reference to “reproductive health”, which is a known euphemism that public health authorities and Planned Parenthood use for abortion. The Minister of Education and Premier Wynne have made it clear that the Catholic school system must also implement this curriculum without exception. It is unclear how Catholic schools can implement teaching on birth control and abortion, even if retrofitted with a “Catholic lens”. Catholic moral teaching forbids abortion and the use of artificial contraception as grave evils.

The new Sex-Ed document is clearly a much more radical document than it’s original 2010 incarnation. Over the next few days, CLC will post a detailed summary of the new curriculum to save parents having to read through 200+ pages. In the meantime, you can read excerpts from the original 2010 version below.

**************ANALYSIS OF THE 2010 SEX-ED CURRICULUM***************

Now that the Ontario Liberal Party has a majority in government and no election is in sight, Premier Kathleen Wynne has “coincidentally” announced that in the fall of 2015, she will reintroduce the graphic Sex Ed Curriculum that had outraged parents in 2010.

Back then, parents and religious leaders came out angrily against Liberal plans to teach early grades about age-inappropriate topics like masturbation, anal sex, vaginal lubrication, and the idea that being male or female is merely a “social construct”.

So strong was the backlash that McGuinty “shelved” the curriculum after only 3 days of public outcry.

At the time, CLC warned that the curriculum was only “temporarily” shelved and would return. Kathleen Wynne proved us right by putting this at the top of her agenda at a time when this won’t hurt her at the voting booth.

Below are some shocking excerpts from the 2010 curriculum that the Education Ministry had posted online, before the onslaught by parents and religious leaders forced Premier McGuinty to retract it. It is widely believed that the new curriculum will be very similar to the original version. In fact, Liz Sandals, the current Education Minister has stated several times the original “expert consultations” conducted for the 2010 version will still form a basis for what Liberals are planning to impose on classrooms in 2015.

Grade 1 (age 6)

– Graphic lesson on sexual body parts including “penis”, “testicles”, “vagina”, “vulva” and more

Grade 3 (age 8): Homosexuality

-Will normalize homosexual family structures and homosexual “marriage” in the minds of 8-year-olds, without regard for the religious/moral beliefs of families

Grade 3: Gender as a changeable social construct

-Will teach the disputed theory of “gender identity” as if it were fact. This is the notion that whether you’re a boy or a girl does not necessarily relate to your physical anatomy. It is merely a “social construct”. Gender is “fluid” according to this theory, and any little boy can decide that he is actually a girl, if that’s the way he feels in his mind, or vice-versa.
Note: The potential for causing serious sexual confusion in the minds of children is very real with this teaching

-This is not science-based teaching, but rather a dangerous socio-political ideology that seeks to normalize a mental disorder recognized by the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic & Statistics Manual. This ideology being foisted on school children by the Wynne government aims to intdoctrinate the next generation into believing that transgenderism/transsexualism is an innate, genetic characteristic just like skin colour or race.

Grade 4: Romantic dating

-Will introduce children to the idea of being “more than just friends” and “going out” with classmates whom they may “like”. See excerpt below from the actual 2010 curriculum.

-Many parents would find that introducing this idea of dating at age 9 is not age-appropriate. On its own this content might not seem too serious, but in the context of the other controversial lessons, plus the curriculum’s connections to an alleged child pornographer (jump to link) and to unsavoury groups who promote anal play, group sex, S&M, and bondage (jump to link), parents are prudent to see a red flag here.

Grade 6 (age 12): Masturbation

-Encourages masturbation as a “pleasurable” way for children to learn about their bodies, that is “not harmful”
-In addition to promoting the practice of masturbation, the curriculum will teach about “vaginal lubrication”.

Grade 7 (age 13): Anal & Oral Sex

Under the pretext of encouraging abstinence from behaviours associated with high risk for STDs, the curriculum uses a sleight of hand to sneakily introduce to children the concepts of “anal intercourse” and “oral-genital contact”. Those are ideas that many of these 12-13 year old kids might not be aware of, or at least, have never seriously considered as an act they could be taking part in now. In another sleight of hand, “anal intercourse” is lumped in as a sexual act of the same kind as vaginal intercourse, with no differentiation between the two types of sexual acts, either morally or with respect to risk for sexually transmitted disease, for which the former carries dramatically higher risk.

Was the goal in this sneaky introduction of graphic sex acts to avoid the accusation that the Minister was promoting a gay agenda, seeking to normalize gay sex in the minds of kids? By claiming that this curriculum is about encouraging kids to “delay” these high risk sexual activities, many casual readers won’t notice that what has actually occurred is that the teacher has planted ideas in the minds of children that might not otherwise be present, regarding “anal intercourse”, “oral-genital contact”, etc.

Anal intercourse is not an activity to which the government should be giving any semblance of approval whatsoever. It is the most efficient method of transmitting the AIDS virus, so much so, that despite all the “safe sex” and condom education over the past 20 years, epidemiologists still predict that 50% of men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) will eventually contract HIV.

In fact, the Ontario government’s chief epidemiologist publishes a report on the spread of HIV every 4 years. In the most recent study, collecting data between 2005 to 2008, it found that almost 1 in 4 MSM who live in Toronto (21.9%), are currently infected with HIV. See chart below. Extrapolating the current growth rate for infection tells us that by the time 2012 public health data becomes available, almost 1 out of every 3 actively gay men in Toronto will be infected with HIV. So, why exactly does Premier Kathleen Wynne want to get 12 and 13 year olds thinking about ‘anal intercourse’?

If the government’s going to talk about anal sex at all, it should be at older ages and the message should be “That’s a risky, potentially fatal activity. Don’t do it”. The curriculum makes no mention that anal intercourse, in the context of male-on-male sex, leads directly to the death of a large percentage of those who practice it, and is generally unhealthy for all practicioners. People have a right to know about serious health risks before they choose to engage in it. Withholding such vital information is an inexcusable moral failure. In fact, Kathleen Wynne’s Sex Ed curriculum leaves 12 and 13 year olds with a distinct impression that “communicating clearly with each other when making decisions” is all that’s required for this activity to be “responsible and safe”.

Benjamin Levin: Pedophilic influence?

It’s important to consider the fact that this curriculum was also written under the direction of an alleged child pornographer, Mr. Benjamin Levin. He was the Deputy Education Minister at the time, serving under then Education Minister Kathleen Wynne. Levin was charged by police with 7 counts of making and distributing child pornography.

Levin was charged by police with 7 counts of making and distributing child pornography. Although the man has not yet been proven guilty in a court of law, many people are questioning whether “grooming” could have been a reason for introducing these explicit subjects at such delicate ages. If the allegations are true, could it be that the curriculum was designed to “prime” children, so as to make them sexually available?

When it is found that an alleged pedophile was in charge of writing what many parents perceive to be graphic, age-inappropriate Sex Ed curriculum, parents cannot be blamed for wanting no part of the curriculum. Should warning bells be going off when we learn that an alleged pedophile oversaw the writing of curriculum which gets 6 year olds talking about their genitals, encourages kids to masturbate, and wants to get 13 year olds thinking about oral sex and anal sex?

The safety of children is too important to ignore Levin’s hand in this curriculum.

Can we know a curriculum by the company that it keeps?

It’s not average moms and dads who are asking for this curriculum to return. In fact 28,000 Ontario parents have signed a petition against it. So who is actually pressuring the Liberals to bring back the controversial curriculum?

Several radical organizations, or those with ties to radical groups have been publicly lobbying the Liberals to bring back the 2010 curriculum since it was first retracted by Premier McGuinty. These include:

OPHEA (The Ontario Physical & Health Education Association): partners with a “sex education expert” called Sexpressions which offers explicit, classroom teaching aids like “The Guide To Getting It On Book”
Planned Parenthood Toronto: promotes abortion, anal play (e.g. fisting), sex toys, and the viewing of pornography. See excerpts below from Planned Parenthood’s educational resources for 13-year-olds.

Queer Ontario: promotes bondage, sadism/masochism, casual sex and group sex (see below from their website)

Communist Party of Canada (Ontario): like all communists, it seeks to throw off “the shackles” of God’s moral laws in society and bring about an atheist utopia where virtually all areas of public and private life are dominated by an all-powerful state.
When groups who advocate for the normalization of sadism, group sex, anal play and viewing pornography are demanding the return of the 2010 Sex Ed curriculum, parents cannot be blamed for believing that these classroom lessons will have the effect of sexualizing young children.

Help us warn parents

Due to biased and poor media coverage of this controversial Sex Ed curriculum, most Ontario families are unaware that this dangerous curriculum update will be imposed on their children and grandchildren starting in the fall 2015 school year. Although Campaign Life Coalition and other pro-family groups have been trying to educate the public about the harmful nature of this curriculum, our reach is limited. What’s missing education by clergy from the pulpit. To help make it easy for clergy to inform their congregation members about the looming Sex Ed changes, we have provided a sample bulletin announcement and sample pulpit announcement for pastors. Click here to download it in PDF format, then give it to your pastor or church secretary and respectfully ask if they would include it over the coming weeks and months. Handouts for small group discussion are available as well as a Powerpoint presentation from Campaign Life Coalition.

Related ‘Sex Ed Curriculum’ Pages

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Of TALKING ZOMBIES and THE SECULAR WAR ON CHILDREN

Talking zombie, Professor Richard Dawkins, who as an atheist cannot claim to

have free will or the ability, on his own volition,  to produce thoughts claimed in a

Twitter rant that it is “immoral” for parents of a baby with Down Syndrome to not kill

the baby  in an abortion”. Talking zombie Dawkins could probably be excused

because with the two deficiencies stated above he is clearly unable to reason .

The problem for those of us  with  a world view which allows the capacity for reason is

that the talking zombies are  seeking   to inform public policy. This talking zombie

even fails to realise that he has no basis, save  his feelings, for determining right and

wrong, moral and immoral

 

xxxxx E N D S  xxxxx

 

http://www.lifenews.com/2014/08/20/bioethicist-richard-dawkins-its-immoral-not-to-abort-babies-with-down-syndrome/

“Bioethicist” Richard Dawkins: It’s “Immoral” Not to Abort Babies With Down Syndrome
NATIONAL STEVEN ERTELT AUG 20, 2014 | 1:31PM WASHINGTON, DC

OzzZhX-__400x400

 

Peter Singer move over. There’s a new “bioethicist” in town who has moral directives for the world: Richard Dawkins. In a Twitter rant today, Dawkins pushed the notion that it is “immoral” for parents of a baby with Down Syndrome to not kill the baby in an abortion.

Dawkins pushed the concept in a tweet criticizing Ireland’s ban on most abortions and in a conversation with someone on Twitter.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Of sexual anarchy, moral nihilism and talking zombies.

 

“The  fool  has  said  in his  heart… there  is  no  God”

……Psalm 14:1…..

Atheists often claim to be rational and to base their decision making on reason however the following succinctly shows why if atheists really understood their world view they would have to regard themselves as zombies, fully determined by matter and the laws of physics. They can neither have free will nor initiate thoughts both of which are necessary if one is to claim the ability to reason.  If atheism is true the status of human beings is represented by ( C ) in the diagram below.

The diagram is from an article “The Lucretian swerve: The biological basis of human behavior and the criminal justice system” by Anthony R. Cashmore published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States (PNAS) vol. 107 no. 10 4499–4504.

These  walking  zombies  who  have  no  free  will  and  cannot  produced  their   own thoughts  are  seeking to  impose  sexual  anarchy  and  moral  nihilism  as  paradigms  for  social  policy  under  the  rubric  of  secularism.

Their present legislative agenda includes the normalisation of LGBTTTIQ pathology and same sex marriage.

The  incoherent madness  of  these  walking  zombies must be  rejected  by all  well thinking citizens.

 

Lucretian swerve  large

 

Models for the flow of information between unconscious neural activity and conscious thought. In A, the commonly accepted model is shown whereby WILL influences conscious thought and, in turn, unconscious neural activity, to direct behavior. The difficulty with this model is that there is no causal component directing WILL. In B, a causal component for WILL is introduced; however WILL now simply reflects unconscious neural activity and GES (genes, environment, and stochasticism). That is, WILL loses its “freedom.” In C, WILL is dispensed with, and conscious thought is simply a reflection of unconscious neural activity and GES. Conscious thought is now primarily a means of following—more than a means of influencing—the direction of behavior by unconscious neural activity. This subservient role of conscious thought in directing behavior in model C, is indicated by the dotted arrow 2 (contrasting with the solid line for the corresponding arrow in A and B).

 

xxxxxxxxxx

A)

Wikipedia  indicates  that   the  American Psychiatry  Association  and  others  are  of  the view  ” that same-sex sexual and romantic attractions, feelings, and behaviors are normal and positive variations of human sexuality”.

See :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_and_psychology

In 1973, the American Psychiatric Association declassified homosexuality as a mental disorder. The American Psychological Association Council of Representatives followed in 1975.[3] Thereafter other major mental health organizations followed and it was finally declassified by the World Health Organization in 1990. Consequently, while some still believe homosexuality is a mental disorder, the current research and clinical literature demonstrate that same-sex sexual and romantic attractions, feelings, and behaviors are normal and positive variations of human sexuality, reflecting the official positions of the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association.

B)

Human rights  activists,  The  United  Nations  and  western  democracies  are  seeking  to re-order  human societies  to  reflect  the  above   premise  (which is  not  proven)   that  homosexual  sexual  orientation (attraction, feelings  and  behaviour)  is  a  normal  and  positive variation of  human  sexuality   that   should  be  granted  minority status   and   accorded  all  the  rights  enjoyed  by  heterosexuals  including  the right  to  marry.   

C)

Men  who  have  sex  with   Men  do  not  have  the  option  of  vaginal  sex .

Their  equivalent   acts  of  intimacy  would  be  such  as   those  described  in  the “Hard  Cell  Playroom”   which  include : anal  penetration.  fisting,  felching, rimming, watersports, etc.    which are  very  unhealthy   and   most   involve  contact  with fecal  matter.  

The  Hard  Cell  Playroom  website  indicates  that :

“The 2006 Gay Men’s Sex Survey found that in the previous 12 months 13% of men had fisted or been fisted. Fisting was almost twice as common as being fisted”.

See  :  http://www.hardcell.org.uk/playroom13.htm

http://www.hardcell.org.uk/en/playroom/scat/

Scat / Things to know

Also known in personal ads and internet profiles as:

  • brown
  • dirty (as in ‘into dirty’)
  • scatology.

Hanky code

Brown worn:

  • on the left (wants to dump on you)
  • on the right (wants to be dumped on).

What is scat?

Scat involves playing with shit, smearing it on your or his body, and sometimes eating it. It can also mean just getting off on seeing another guy dump his load.

Farming’ is taking shit from public toilets to play with.

What’s the attraction?

Taboos around cleanliness couldn’t be more powerfully broken by shit play: it’s everything we’ve been told not to do since childhood.

Men can be drawn to scat precisely because it provokes such a strong negative reaction in others. Lovers of scat might get a kick from stepping over what for most people is the line between what’s OK and what’s too extreme. Scat is perhaps the ultimate in sex without limits or inhibitions.

Privately we’re often fascinated by our own bowel movements and excrement. Scat lets men explore and share this interest and enjoy a special bond with other lovers of shit.

For scat fans shit can excite all the senses with its warmth, texture, smell, colour and possibly taste. Just like contact with the intimate body fluids of cum, spit or piss, sex involving shit can be a sign of intense closeness as someone is offering something that’s come from deep inside them. And in an intense power play scene, nothing is more symbolic of degradation, humiliation and control than exposure to faeces.

http://www.hardcell.org.uk/en/playroom/fisting/

FISTING

Fisting / Things to know / What can go wrong?

Also known in personal ads and internet profiles as:

  • fistfucking
  • ff
  • handballing
  • red.

Hanky code

Red, worn:

  • on the left (wants to fist)
  • on the right (wants to be fisted)
  • round the neck (both gives and takes a fist).

What is fisting?

Fisting involves putting a hand, sometimes forearm, into another man’s arse, occasionally going up as far as the lower (sigmoid) colon. It doesn’t mean clenching your fist into a ball and pushing it into someone’s arse hole, which is usually not possible. Instead fingers are kept pointing straight and close together; a fist shape can be made once inside the arse.

Punch fucking is inserting a clenched fist in and out of the hole, like a cock pumps an arse. Due to the difficulties and potential dangers of doing this it’s best left to advanced fisters.

Double fisting means putting two hands inside the arse.

Piston fucking or jackhammering is when one man puts his dick and hand inside the other man’s arse, then wanks himself off inside the guy’s arse.

Chariot racing is when one fister fists two men (one hand in each arse).

The 2006 Gay Men’s Sex Survey found that in the previous 12 months 13% of men had fisted or been fisted. Fisting was almost twice as common as being fisted.

What’s the attraction?

Fisting fans call it the ultimate sexual experience, involving intense feelings of trust, intimacy and vulnerability. A guy being fisted is putting himself in the other man’s hands.

Fisting allows direct stimulation of the prostate (known as the ‘male’ G spot), the walnut shaped gland inside the arse where the base of the dick ends, below the belly button. Stroking it gives stronger orgasms. Manipulating the prostate triggers in the bottom the desire to piss, even with an empty bladder: this can be very pleasurable. A fister may be able to trigger an orgasm in the fistee, even though his cock is soft.

When the fister’s hand first enters the arse, the sensation is like being fucked by a large cock, but more powerful. Most cocks aren’t wide or long enough to do what a fist can: fill the rectum, prod the far side or go through the lower colon. So taking a hand is much more intense.

As the fister moves his hand deep inside, trying to get the best position to move through the sphincter of the lower (sigmoid) colon, the pulsating sensations coming from the fistee’s arse can become so strong that he can almost lose touch with the real world. When the fister finds the sphincter to the colon and moves his hand through it, the waves of pleasure can become even more intense. The pleasure centre is inside the body and this feeling is a real buzz for the fistee: he senses something moving within his body, not at the surface.

Deep fisting

Some say the rhythmic pumping of a hand up and down and around inside the colon is bliss, that no other sexual sensation comes close. If the fistee can take the fister’s hand clenched into a fist – making it wider so it rubs more against the muscular wall of the colon – the sensations get even stronger. This shouldn’t be painful.

The pleasure can be so strong and come in such strong waves that a fistee might almost feel hypnotised. This is deep fisting, and a fistee only comes to this with time and patience. A man regularly fisted by the same guy can be played like a musical instrument by his top, which is where the top gets his pleasure.

Hard-ons

When a man’s being fisted and experiencing the pleasure coming from his arse, he doesn’t think about his cock – it stays soft. Even if the fistee plays with it during fisting, it’s unlikely he’d get an erection unless he’s taken a drug like Viagra. The fistee’s mind is totally concentrated on his arse and the feelings coming from inside him.

Pushing limits

The fist is a potent symbol of masculine strength. Taking one inside can represent an even more powerful act of penetration, domination and surrender than taking a cock. Fisters can see themselves as a select group of hardcore men marked out by an act that shocks and disturbs the more conventional and less sexually adventurous.

Fisting involves pushing your limits, and for some the feeling of a man reaching deep inside them can’t be beaten. A regular fuck with a cock just might not be fulfilling enough, especially if you want to feel your ring being stretched and your insides probed like never before.

 

 
Posted in "farming", "rights", American Psychiatry Association and sexual orientation, anal sex, Buggery law, chariot racing, Coprophagia, felching, fisting, Hard Cell, Hard Cell Playroom, homophobe, Homophobia, MSM, privacy rights, scat, sexual orientaation, Sexual orientation, The Terrence Higgins Trust, World Health Organization and Sexual Orientation | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Noble Chinese embrace the bible. Sexually anarchist and morally nihilistic secularists / atheists (talking zombies) embrace depravity.

London Pride 2

NYC76899

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment