The homofascist Gaystapo seeking to control thought and speech

 

http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/canada/british-columbia/leaders-launch-petition-against-franklin-graham-1.3991375

 

 

Members of Vancouver’s Christian community and city officials are furiously trying to stop controversial Christian evangelist Franklin Graham from speaking to thousands of people at an event next week at Rogers Arena.

Graham is speaking at the Festival of Hope event that’s being organized by the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association.

“This is unusual for us to deal with in Vancouver – this kind of individual and this kind of hate rhetoric,” said Councillor Tim Stevenson.

Graham is a polarizing figure who has drawn attention for comments that denigrate minorities. He’s been quoted calling on the U.S. “to use weapons of mass destruction if need be” and referring to Islam as “a very evil and a very wicked religion.”

Most recently, the son of famous televangelist Billy Graham took the spotlight for reading a passage of scripture at the inauguration of U.S. President Donald Trump.

In the past, he’s made disparaging remarks about homosexuals, once praising Russian President Vladmir Putin for his oppressive stance toward members of the LGBTQ community.

“We live in a country that has free speech, but there’s a difference between free speech and hate speech” said Stevenson, who is also an ordained minister of the United Church of Canada.

Stevenson said the worry is that Graham will incite hate speech and that’s concerning in light of the recent attack at a Quebec mosque that left six dead.

“The city has an issue of safety here and we’re really concerned about it.”

On Feb. 10, Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson was part of a meeting of 14 local leaders from evangelical, Anglican, Roman Catholic and other Christian groups.

They’ve now penned a letter to organizers pushing for Franklin to be removed from the event.

“We have no problem with someone coming to preach the gospel. But it can’t be such a divisive figure that’s so anti-Muslim, anti-gay, anti-black,” said Tom Cooper, a minister and the president of the City in Focus Group.

A petition has also been launched calling for Franklin’s removal.

Both Stevenson and Cooper said if the situation was reversed, there would be an uproar.

“If there was a fiery imam that came to Vancouver and held a rally with 30,000 Muslims and his rhetoric had been of the same nature — the hatred toward Christians — we know we’d have people tramping into city hall saying: ‘What are you doing about this imam?'” said Stevenson.

Organizers not backing down

“With every Festival of Hope we do in every city around the world there’s always going to be some opposition to what we’re doing,” said Frank King of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association of Canada, who are organizing the festival.

King said the association acknowledges the opposition, but said it has no plans to remove Franklin Graham from the event, which he said has taken years to plan.

“To even entertain any kind of thought of changing any event … we simply would not do that.”

The three-day event is meant to spread the message of Christianity and invites non-Christians to attend.

“He’ll be inviting people to become Christians at each of these events – that’s his sole purpose for being here in Vancouver,” said King.

Local groups helping organize the event echo that view.

“Franklin Graham is not coming to present an American political situation or his perspectives politically,” said Giulio Lorefice Gabeli, a pastor with the Westwood Community Church.

“It really has nothing to do with the Festival of Hope. It has nothing to do with him coming here. To me, I feel there’s a lot of fear that’s being generated that is unfounded.”

The event takes March 3 to 5

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A matter of biology not simply violence.

 

Those who  find  pleasure  in sadomasochism sometimes use  handcuffs  in their  pleasure seeking  activities  should  handcuffing  someone against  their will therefore  be  considered  rape  ? 

 

 

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/commentary/20170220/garth-rattray-incongruity-jamaican-rape

Garth Rattray | The Incongruity Of Jamaican Rape
Published:Monday | February 20, 2017 | 12:00 AM
I am not pushing or facilitating anyone’s agenda, but we cannot legislate sexuality. How people feel and what they do privately is beyond our control.

As long as someone’s sexual programming does not involve the participation of another human being who is incapable of having consensual sexual intercourse, what two consenting adults do in private is between them and their God. I won’t dignify bestiality with a comment. Interestingly, though, there’s a growing controversy regarding robots manufactured and programmed to give sexual pleasure to humans.

Our country is saddled with the impossible task of objectively redefining ‘rape’. I am opposed to the currently accepted general definition because it employs the use of the word ‘intercourse’. The dictionary definition is, ‘Forced sexual intercourse; sexual assault; sexual intercourse between an adult and a minor. Rape may be heterosexual (involving members of opposite sexes) or homosexual (involving members of the same sex). Rape involves insertion of an erect penis or an inanimate object into the female vagina or the male anus. Legal definitions of rape may also include forced oral sex and other sexual acts.’

I take exception because sexual ‘intercourse’ suggests mutuality – ‘lovemaking, making love, sex act, act of love, sexual relations, intimate relations, intimacy, coupling, mating, going to bed with someone, sleeping with someone’. Rape has nothing to do with love or intimate relations. It’s a frightfully brutal act of unspeakable violence and the demonstration of power over another, and should be on par with homicide.

In Jamaica, our definition of rape fails to mention anal or oral penetration. It is constrained by a law dating back to January 1, 1864 – that was not very long after slavery was officially abolished. That was also the year before the Morant Bay Rebellion and about 80 years before full universal adult suffrage. That is 153 years (more than six generations) ago.

RESOUNDING DENIAL

The wording of the law betrays blatant naivety or resounding denial of human sexual practices. It erroneously assumes that peno-anal intercourse only occurs between homosexual males. That is very far from what obtains in reality. It also makes no mention of other orifices used during sexual intercourse.

Even our ‘modern’ Sexual Offences Act skilfully uses wording that does not mention ‘insertion’ of the penis into the anus. It confines ‘sexual intercourse’ as the penetration of the vagina of one person by the penis of another person and ‘rape’ as a man having sexual intercourse with a woman under certain specified circumstances.

The Church is perfectly right to adhere to its religious beliefs, but society has come out of the closet. The reality is that individuals have been engaged in sexual practices that do not conform to what most people choose to view as ‘normal’.

Therein lies the dilemma in Jamaica. Since peno-anal ‘sex’ is so illegal that it cannot exist, peno-anal rape (of a male or a female) also cannot exist. As some have painstakingly pointed out, the range of possible punishment for rape and for grievous sexual assault are very different. So, if an offender forces his penis inside a female’s vagina, he will be charged for rape and risks extremely long incarceration.

But, if he forces his penis inside her anus/rectum (which must be far more brutal, painful, degrading, far more physically dangerous, far more likely to transmit any disease, and far more likely to cause permanent psychological damage/devastation), he could receive a far lighter sentence!

Seems to me that the law gives despicable sexual predators the green light to force their victims into anal and/or oral penetration. The suggestion to equate ‘rape’ (from the Latin, rapere – to seize or take by force all pride, privacy, dignity, self-determination and sometimes, sanity) and ‘grievous sexual assault’ significantly diminishes the horror and trauma experienced by rape victims and is terribly unfair to them. The language and, therefore, psychological impact of ‘rape’ and ‘sexual assault’ are vastly different.

Is this what we want? Young and old women and men, boys and girls violated by dangerous, sadistic, perverted, cruel monsters, who could receive relatively light sentences simply because they choose to torture and mercilessly violate their victims by forcefully penetrating their mouths, anus/rectum? Or do we need to separate Church from State?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Peter Espeut : Telling it like it is

 

 

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/commentary/20170210/peter-espeut-ginnalship-and-redefining-rape

 

 

Peter Espeut | Ginnalship And Redefining Rape

Published:Friday | February 10, 2017 | 12:00 AM
A parliamentary committee has been tasked to come up with a ‘perfect definition’ of rape, and the lobbyists are lining up, sensing the high stakes.

Rape is sexual intercourse which, if mutually performed, would be legal, but which lacks the consent of one of the partners. At the moment, the definition of rape is limited to a man placing his penis into a woman’s vagina without her consent, because, in law, only penis-vagina penetration is recognised as sexual intercourse.

The suggested approach ‘to be fair to the boys’ is to change the definition of sexual intercourse to include other activities, such as anal intercourse, penetration of the mouth, or penetration by non-sex organs and objects. Therefore, any of these activities performed without the consent of one of the parties would now be called rape, and would attract the same penalty as forced penis-vagina penetration.

Placing all these other activities under the category of ‘sexual intercourse’ puts them on equal footing with penis-vagina penetration, and normalises them. Changing the definition of rape to include forced anal sex will imply that consensual buggery should be legal, and is a samfie attempt to legalise buggery through the back door. That is why J-FLAG and the pro-gay public defender support the redefinition.

But what is the injury that the redefinition is supposed to redress? Currently, men who sexually impose themselves upon other men can be charged with ‘grievous sexual assault’, which carries a maximum penalty on summary conviction in the parish court of a prison term not exceeding three years, and on conviction in the circuit court, to imprisonment for life or other penalties in the discretion of the judge, but not less than a 15-year prison term.

Buggery itself carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison. The crime of rape (forced vaginal penetration), as currently defined, carries a maximum penalty of imprisonment for life.

DISPARITY IN PENALTIES

Quite correctly, the commentators are pointing out the present disparity between the penalties for rape and grievous sexual assault tried in the

parish court, although, as you can see, the disparity is not great. Their call, they say, for the redefinition of sexual intercourse – and therefore rape – will equalise the penalties for the offences, and will be ‘fair to the boys’.

But it is not hard to see the ginnalship. What it will really do is provide the grounds for an argument to equalise and legalise and normalise all forms of sexual intercourse, including buggery, as long as there is consent of all the parties, and that is why the LGBTQI activists and all the libertarians have taken to the airwaves and the print media to support it.

And it is no surprise that the Jamaica Coalition for a Healthy Society and other Christian groups have quickly come out against this attempt to normalise what they consider to be abnormal, unnatural and bestial acts; and predictably, this has drawn the fire of anti-Christian elements in the media. We have our culture wars here in Jamaica, too!

If the goal is to equalise in law the punishment of forced anal sex and forced vaginal sex, the obvious and easiest approach is to equalise the penalties for rape (forced vaginal sex) and grievous sexual assault (which includes forced anal sex and many other things besides). This much simpler solution to the imbalance is much more elegant than going through a redefinition of sexual intercourse, which carries with it so many contentious implications.

But, of course, if the real intention is to provide a route to legalise buggery, rather than any sympathy for the plight of buggered boys, the lobbyists will simply continue to press for redefinition.

The news reports state that Minister Delroy Chuck has tasked the parliamentary committee to come up with a “perfect definition” of rape that will satisfy the “United Nations and also the public at large”. One might ask, why is the United Nations pushing this gay agenda on us? And why is the Government seeking to satisfy the United Nations rather than the citizens of Jamaica?

I believe that Minister Chuck has given the parliamentary committee an impossible task, for I do not see how one can satisfy both those who wish to normalise LGBTQI sex, and the Church (and the wider Jamaican society), at the same time.

As the USA comes to its senses and seeks to overturn the legal ‘victories’ of their LGBTQI forces, it would be unwise for us to depart from the traditional values that have served us well for so long.

– Peter Espeut is a sociologist and Roman Catholic deacon. Email feedback to columns@gleanerjm.com.

Posted in Buggery law, LGBT + ideology, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Keep LGBT + suppression of freedom of speech out of Jamaica.

 

“No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money”.   Matthew 6 :24

 

Gospel singer Kim Burrell has lost her radio  and  TV shows for saying what God  says about  homosexuality within  the  walls  of  her  church.

The sifting is  on in earnest  we are  about  to  see  who  is  on the Lord’s  side . 

xxxxxxxxx

http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2017/01/university-drops-anti-gay-gospel-singers-radio-show/

 

Texas Southern University is ending Kim Burrell’s radio show “Bridging the Gap” after publicity gained by her anti-gay comments, KTRK reports.

The weekly show debuted in June 2016 and promised listeners Burrell’s “unique take on music, life and society” in a station press release. The show aired Sunday afternoons on the university’s radio station KTSU.

The Houston Chronicle also reports that Burrell’s television talk show “Keep It Moving with Kim Burrell” on CW is no longer listed on the station’s log. The show was started in September.

The controversy started when video of Burrell giving a virulently homophobic sermon surfaced last week. “I came to tell you about sin. That sin nature, that perverted homosexual spirit, and the spirit of delusion and confusion, it has deceived many men and women. You as a man, you open your mouth and take a man’s penis in your face, you are perverted. You are a woman and will shake your face in another woman’s breast, you are perverted.”

After the video surfaced, Burrell said on Facebook that she does not hate LGBT people. “I came on because I care about God’s creation. And every person from the LGBT and any other kind of thing that is supporting gay, I never said LGBT last night, I said S-I-N.”

Several other artists who appeared on the Hidden Figures soundtrack with Burrell have spoken out against Burrell, including Pharrell who wrote, “I condemn hate speech of any kind.”

The singer was scheduled to perform a duet with Pharrell on “The Ellen Show” today, but was dropped as a guest after the video of Burrell’s homophobic comments surfaced.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Two for the price of one : Good riddance to Bera and his LGBT + policies of sexual nihilism , sexual anarchy and gender confusion.

Testifyingtotruth  is  delighted  to  see  the back  of President Obama  aka  Bera , King of  Sodom  and High Priest of  Molech the  Canaanite  god  of  infant sacrifice.

During  his  eight years in office  President Obama’s  determined  commitment  was  to  advance  the sexual  nihilism , sexual anarchy  and  gender  confusion of  the LGBT +  political  ideology  and  the  savagery  and  barbarism  of  pro-chouce feminist ideology  of  abortion on demand  throughout pregnancy..  He  also  sought to silence  christians  whilst  supporting  muslims.  

Hiliary Clinton was  equally  committed  to  this   same  satanic  atheist secular  agenda.

Fortunately well-thinking  Americans  have  rejected  Obama’s  and  Hiliary’s  satanic  atheist  secular  ideology  at  the polls giving  the  land  an opportunity for restoration of  Godly values.  

The nation needs  to embrace the pro-life  philosophy of  nurturing  and  supporting  life  from conception to  natural  death and  completely  reject  the  satanic  atheist ideology of  “death on demand”.

xxxxxxxx  E N D S xxxxxxxx

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/america-rejects-planned-parenthood-and-its-party?utm_content=buffer5f598&utm_medium=social&utm_source=defendmarriage%2Bfacebook&utm_campaign=buffer

trump_acceptance_speech_810_500_55_s_c1

America rejects Planned Parenthood and its party

2016 Presidential Election , Abortion , Donald Trump , Hillary Clinton , Planned Parenthood

Editor’s note: The views expressed herein are solely those of the author. As a non-partisan public charity, LifeSite does not endorse these statements and takes no position on political candidates.

November 9, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – We pro-lifers have been saying it for decades, and working to make it even truer: America is a fundamentally pro-life country. Its cultural and Constitutional DNA are coded with deep respect for the human person as the free image of God, no matter what lies the appointed judges on our courts decide to tell us. We might sin like other people in our nations, but in the long run we lean toward justice. The moment that Americans saw Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Freedom Riders brutalized by police for their peaceful protests, segregation’s fate was sealed. And I believe that the release of the Planned Parenthood videos drove the first nails into the coffin of Roe v. Wade.

Donald Trump was not the first choice of most pro-lifers. But I believe that his conversion on our issue was heartfelt and sincere. The fact that for all his embrace of other socially liberal positions, he came around to support for our country’s most vulnerable people, says much about our culture. It says that it’s moving our way, that even someone as contrarian and stubborn as Donald Trump can get the message. He can come around and see that basic goodness is on our side. In the last debate, when he talked about partial birth abortion, what was visible on his face was deep and natural disgust—in contrast to Clinton’s robotic recital of false talking points.

I think that Donald Trump will help defund Planned Parenthood, every dollar. I think he will stick to his promise of choosing constitutional conservatives for the courts. Beyond what I think is his newfound but real conviction, I believe that he will reward us for rallying behind him—despite the many excellent excuses he offered us to walk away, in the form of his crass comments and dubious past.

What should prolifers do now? We should thank God for sparing us the ruthless abuse of power which Hillary Clinton would have employed to silence us. When we’re finished with that thanksgiving, we should revert to our natural state – as a ruthlessly focused special interest group with only one job: protecting the interests of unborn Americans, the handicapped, and the terminally ill. If you are innocent and threatened by violence, we are your advocate. We take no other stands, and bow to no outside pressure. We won’t listen to bishops who smoosh together our crucial and urgent cause as of equal weight to items on their “seamless garment” wish list. We won’t get sucked into support for foreign wars that backfire and end up turning millions of Christians into refugees. Let others debate the climate or the best levels of spending for Medicaid. We are there to protect the weak from doctors who will kill them. That’s quite enough.

Posted in Barak Obama, Hiliary Clinton, LGBT agenda, LGBT Fascism, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Facebook suppresses truth of Hiliary Clinton’s support for abortion

 

 

It is  amazing  that  in 2016  a candidate  for  the presidency of  the  United  States who supports the  savagery  and   barbarism  of  abortion is  able  to get traction with the  American voters.

 

 

 

hiliary-approves-aborted-fetus

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

New York’s 31 genders or “When lunatics run the asylum”

 

 

This  bit  of  nonsense  is  self explanatory  but  it  has  its roots  in atheism.

Atheist  hold  that  there is no  evidence  for God .  

They deny  design  and  purpose  in the universe  and seek  to impose  their  desires  on reality .  Within  this  paradigm New  York  city considers  that 31 genders  is  not an  exhaustive list  of  normal genders.

 

 

Here Are the 31 Gender Identities New York City Recognizes

Here Are the 31 Gender Identities New York City Recognizes
By Nahema Marchal | 4:40 pm, May 25, 2016

The City of New York is deeply committed to protecting the rights of LGBTQ+ folks. So much so that Big apple residents can choose from a flurry of sobriquets — 31 in total, many of which fall along the male/female/trans continuum— to describe their identity, without ever having to show “proof” of gender.

Gender identities

Gender identities list

Get our exclusive newsletter—the best of Heat Street every day
Here’s the complete list:

Bi-gendered
Cross-dresser
Drag King
Drag Queen
Femme Queen
Female-to-Male
FTM
Gender Bender
Genderqueer
Male-to-Female
MTF
Non-Op
HIJRA
Pangender
Transexual/Transsexual
Trans Person
Woman
Man
Butch
Two-Spirit
Trans
Agender
Third Sex
Gender Fluid
Non-Binary Transgender
Androgyne
Gender Gifted
Gender Blender
Femme
Person of Transgender Experience
Androgynous
My personal favorite is two-spirit. Wait… is that cultural appropriation?

MORE
Chuck C Johnson Sent Me Some Really Weird Emails
Mindy Finn, Evan McMullin’s VP: Now Is The Time For Conservatives
New Trump Hotels Will Change Name to ‘Scion’ Amid Signs Brand Is Flagging
It’s also worth noting that these are just the genders New York City can name. A spokesman for the New York City Commission on Human Rights confirmed to The Daily Caller that the list is “not exhaustive.” Which implies that the list of genders the city recognizes may, in fact, be infinite.

Failure to comply with the NYCCHR’s views on gender identity, by committing what it deems to be “gender identity” based discrimination, can be punished with a fine of up to $250,000 — on top of other damages a complainant may be awarded.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment