Savagery and indulgence : The Secular / Atheist war on little humans – death on demand and denial of heterosexual parents.



“If we could see ourselves as others see us, we would vanish on the spot”.

….Emile M. Cioran….


Secularists /  atheists  often seek  to paint  themselves  as  intelligent  and  rational  but  clearly  they  do  not see  themselves  for  what  they really  are…… or  maybe  they  do  and  this  explains  their  fascist approach  to seek  to silence  opponents.

On January  22, 1973   secularists /  atheists   realised   one  of  their  depraved  ideals  – the  so -called  “right”  to  kill  unborn humans  by  the  millions  throughout  pregnancy.  This  achievement   is  due  to  the  Roe  vs  Wade  and  Doe  vs  Bolton  decisions of  the  US  Supreme  Court.

Secularists  /  atheists  continue  to  show  their  depravity claiming  “rights”  to  scat, farming, fisting, felching  etc.

As  the  USA  and  western Europe  return  to the  vomit they had  been rescued  from  by  the  christian influence over  the last  two  millennia   one  can expect  even more  scandalous  claims about  rights.  NAMBLA  –  the  North American Man / Boy  Love  Association has already  framed  its  objectives as  one  of  human rights

Fortunately  in the  ocean  of  depravity  there  is  always  a  remnant so let  us continue  to pray  for  and  support  pro-life  groups  in the  USA  as  they  stand  against  the agents  of  death  among  the  secularists /  atheists.




Denied  innocence –  Public Nakedness


Denied Life –  Mutilated – Abortion (women’s right)


Denied  a mother

xxxxx  ENDS xxxx

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the Court ruled 7–2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman’s decision to have an abortion, but that this right must be balanced against the state’s two legitimate interests in regulating abortions: protecting prenatal life and protecting women’s health. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a pregnancy, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of abortion to the third trimester of pregnancy.

The Court later rejected Roe ’​s trimester framework, while affirming Roe ’​s central holding that a person has a right to abortion until viability.[1] The Roe decision defined “viable” as being “potentially able to live outside the mother’s womb, albeit with artificial aid”, adding that viability “is usually placed at about seven months (28 weeks) but may occur earlier, even at 24 weeks.”[2]

In disallowing many state and federal restrictions on abortion in the United States,[3][4] Roe v. Wade prompted a national debate that continues today about issues including whether, and to what extent, abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, what methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication, and what the role should be of religious and moral views in the political sphere. Roe v. Wade reshaped national politics, dividing much of the United States into pro-choice and pro-life camps, while activating grassroots movements on both sides.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s