“If we’re serious about enforcing the new standard, thousands of other employees who donated to the same anti-gay ballot measure must be punished”.
Kimberly Jean “Kim” Bailey Davis (born September 17, 1965) is a Rowan County, Kentucky, clerk who defied a U.S. Federal Court order requiring that she issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples following the Obergefell v. Hodges U.S. Supreme Court case that legalized same-sex marriage in the United States.
Davis refused to issue a marriage license to David Moore and his partner of 11 years, David Ermold, and to three other couples, including two heterosexual couples. After a court ordered her to issue licenses as required by law, her lawyers filed an emergency application with the Supreme Court seeking to put the lower court’s order on hold while she pursued an appeal. After the Supreme Court denied the application, Davis continued to deny the licenses, saying she was acting “under God’s authority”. On September 3, 2015, she was jailed for contempt of court and released five days later. Kentucky’s attorney general is considering whether a special prosecutor should pursue potential charges of official misconduct against her.
xxxxxx E N D S xxxxx
The USA once the land of the brave and the free is now the “land of
homosexual rights and homosexual rights only and of the “utterly
fascist , utterly Stalinist Gaystapo “
Having ousted Brendan Eich from Mozilla for supporting marriage being only
between a man and a woman in Proposition 8 in 2008 there is now a suggestion
being made that all those who supported proposition 8 should be punished.
Kim Davis, county clerk in Kentucky , is the most recent person to run afoul of the
Gaystapo in the new USA aka Sodom- she was imprisoned for contempt of court for
refusing to obey the order of SCOTUS to issue marriage certificates to same sex
The Gaystapo – which is totalitarian and fascist in political commitment – is likely to further use the now hostile to human rights and sympathetic to gay rights posture of the majority on the US Supreme Court to further intimidate and imprison those who do not embrace LGBTTTIQism .
The author of the article below , William Saletan, may be being “tongue in check” i.e is probably not serious about the suggestion but if Brendan Eich should be punished what is the logical basis for not punishing everyone who supported proposition 8 ?
How can any self respecting democracy tolerate the “utterly fascist,utterly Stalinist” Gaystapo ?
Should Jamaica give the Gaystapo an inch and risk losing cherished freedoms?
President Obama’s ” the world as it should be”
Gay Pride on the street – Kim Davis in prison
xxxxx E N D S xxxxx
BRENDAN EICH IS JUST THE BEGINNING. LET’S PURGE ALL 35,000 DONORS TO PROP 8.
HOW YOU LOOK AT THINGS.APRIL 4 2014 8:12 AM
Purge the Bigots
Brendan Eich is just the beginning. Let’s oust everyone who donated to the campaign against gay marriage.
By William Saletan
I am committed to ensuring that Mozilla is, and will remain, a place that includes and supports everyone, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, age, race, ethnicity, economic status, or religion.
You will see exemplary behavior from me toward everyone in our community, no matter who they are; and the same toward all those whom we hope will join, and for those who use our products. Mozilla’s inclusive health benefits policies will not regress in any way. And I will not tolerate behavior among community members that violates our Community Participation Guidelines or (for employees) our inclusive and non-discriminatory employment policies.
But that wasn’t enough. A revolt among Mozilla staffers, compounded by pressure from software developers, outrage on Twitter and a boycott movement spearheaded by OkCupid, has driven Eich out. Baker, having accepted Eich’s resignation, offers this apology: “We know why people are hurt and angry, and they are right: it’s because we haven’t stayed true to ourselves.”
Some of my colleagues are celebrating. They call Eich a bigot who got what he deserved. I agree. But let’s not stop here. If we’re serious about enforcing the new standard, thousands of other employees who donated to the same anti-gay ballot measure must be punished.
More than 35,000 people gave money to the campaign for Proposition 8, the 2008 ballot measure that declared, “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.” You can download the entire list, via the Los Angeles Times, as a compressed spreadsheet. (Click the link that says, “Download CSV.”) Each row lists the donor’s employer. If you organize the data by company, you can add up the total number of donors and dollars that came from people associated with that company.
The first thing you’ll notice, if you search for Eich, is that he’s the only Mozilla employee who gave to the campaign for Prop 8. His $1,000 was more than canceled out by three Mozilla employees who donated to the other side.
The next thing you’ll notice is that other companies, including other tech firms, substantially outscored Mozilla in pro-Prop 8 contributions attributed to their employees. That includes Adobe, Apple, Google, Microsoft, Oracle, Sun Microsystems, and Yahoo, as well as Disney, DreamWorks, Gap, and Warner Bros.
Thirty-seven companies in the database are linked to more than 1,300 employees who gave nearly $1 million in combined contributions to the campaign for Prop 8. Twenty-five tech companies are linked to 435 employees who gave more than $300,000. Many of these employees gave $1,000 apiece, if not more. Some, like Eich, are probably senior executives.
Why do these bigots still have jobs? Let’s go get them.
To organize the next stage of the purge, I’ve compiled the financial data into three tables. Here’s the first table. It shows 37 companies whose names, in one form or another, appear next to a total of at least $10,000 (per company) in donations to Prop 8. The list isn’t complete, but it’s a start.
The next table, below, shows 25 tech companies whose employees donated to the campaign for Prop 8. Again, the list isn’t exhaustive. But every one of these companies outscored Mozilla in associated contributions to Prop 8.
The last table, below, shows several other companies that didn’t hit the $10,000 threshold but did surpass Mozilla in money for Prop 8. Some of them might surprise you.
The numbers in these tables don’t represent contributions from the companies. (All the money came from individuals.) Nor do they reflect the balance of contributions that came from a company’s employees. (I haven’t added up the donations that went to the campaign against Prop 8.) A quick glance here and there suggests that in many cases, the balance of contributions from these companies went against the ballot measure.
But why stop there? More…
But those caveats are true of Mozilla, too. And we’re not cutting Mozilla any slack, are we?
If we’re serious about taking down corporate officers who supported Proposition 8, and boycotting employers who promote them, we’d better get cracking on the rest of the list. Otherwise, perhaps we should put down the pitchforks.
Also in Slate:
The Astonishing Conservative Hypocrisy Over Mozilla and the First Amendment
We Shouldn’t Forgive Brendan Eich for His Homophobic Past—Yet If You’re Against Gay Marriage, You’re a Bad CEO