More junk science supporting “sexual rights” from the intellectual ghetto ?

The  sexual  rights  revolution  and  the Gay rights  movement  were  built  on  the  junk  science  of  Alfred  Kinsey  and  Evelyn  Hooker.
It is therefore  important that persons be aware of  other junk science riddled with confirmation bias coming out of intellectual ghettoes (single minded ideologically liberal departments in universities and colleges. This  phenomenon   has been identified by research). As the following abstract and the article below indicate  the problem is both real and serious.

xxxxxx E N D S xxxxx

http://the-good-news.storage.googleapis.com/assets/pdf/psychology-political-diversity.pdf
Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science
José L. Duarte, Arizona State UniversityJarret T. Crawford, The College of New Jersey Charlotta Stern, Stockholm UniversityJonathan Haidt, New York University—Stern School of Business Lee Jussim, Rutgers UniversityPhilip E. Tetlock, University of PennsylvaniaCorresponding Author: Jonathan Haidt, haidt@nyu.edu
Abstract: Psychologists have demonstrated the value of diversity—particularly diversity of viewpoints—for enhancing creativity, discovery, and problem solving. But one key type of viewpoint diversity is lacking in academic psychology in general and social psychology in particular: political diversity. This article reviews the available evidence and finds support for four claims: 1) Academic psychology once had considerable political diversity, but has lost nearly all of it in the last 50 years; 2) This lack of political diversity can undermine the validity of social psychological science via mechanisms such as the embedding of liberal values into research questions and methods, steering researchers away from important but politically unpalatable research topics, and producing conclusions that mischaracterize liberals and conservatives alike; 3) Increased political diversity would improve social psychological science by reducing the impact of bias mechanisms such as confirmation bias, and by empowering dissenting minorities to improve the quality of the majority’s thinking; and 4) The underrepresentation of non- liberals in social psychology is most likely due to a combination of self-selection, hostile climate, and discrimination. We close with recommendations for increasing political diversity in social psychology.

 

xxxxxxxxxx

 

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsm.12975/abstract;jsessionid=9F92528122C82EBC66CA584D0FC1527B.f03t03?userIsAuthenticated=false&deniedAccessCustomisedMessage=

Keywords:
Homophobia;Psychologic Aspects;Psychometry
Abstract
Introduction
Homophobic behavior and a negative attitude toward homosexuals are prevalent among the population. Despite this, few researches have investigated the psychologic aspects associated with homophobia, as psychopathologic symptoms, the defensive system, and attachment styles.

Aim
The aim of this study was to investigate the psychologic factors mentioned earlier and their correlation with homophobia.

Methods
Five hundred fifty-one university students recruited, aged 18–30, were asked to complete several psychometric evaluation.

Main Outcome Measures
In particular, Homophobia Scale (HS) was used to assess homophobia levels, the Symptoms Check List Revised (SCL-90-R) for the identification of psychopathologic symptoms, the Defence Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40) for the evaluation of defense mechanisms and the Relationship Questionnaire (RQ) for attachment styles.

Results
After a regression analysis, we found a significant predictive value of psychoticism (β = 0.142; P = 0.04) and of immature defense mechanisms (β = 0.257; P < 0.0001) for homophobia, while neurotic defense mechanisms (β = −0.123; P = 0.02) and depressive symptoms (β = −0.152; P = 0.04) have an opposite role. Moreover, categorical constructs of the RQ revealed a significant difference between secure and fearful attachments styles in levels of homophobia (secure = 22.09 ± 17.22 vs. fearful = 31.07 ± 25.09; P < 0.05). Finally, a gender difference to HS scores and a significant influence of male sex was found (β = 0.213; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions
We demonstrated the involvement of psychoticism and immature defense mechanisms in homophobic attitudes, while a contrasting role is played by neurotic defense mechanisms and depressive symptoms. Moreover, secure attachment is an indicator of low levels of homophobia compared with the subjects demonstrating a fearful style of attachment. Hence, in the assessment of homophobia and in the relevant programs of prevention, it is necessary to consider the psychologic aspects described earlier. Ciocca G, Tuziak B, Limoncin E, Mollaioli D, Capuano N, Martini A, Carosa E, Fisher AD, Maggi M, Niolu C, Siracusano A, Lenzi A, Jannini EA. Psychoticism, immature defense mechanisms and a fearful attachment style are associated with a higher homophobic attitude. J Sex Med 2015;12:1953–1960.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s