The campaign for pedophile love and “rights” has started

 

The sexually  nihilistic  and  sexually  anarchist  atheist secularists who  have  so  far  achieved  LGBTTTIQist  dominance  in secular  countries  like  the  USA, UK, Canada  and  other  western democracies  with the help  of  politicians  like  President  Obama have  turned  their  attention to  sex  with children.

The  pedophiles  have at  least  a  two – pronged  approach to achieving  their  objectives.  

Firstly  they  are introducing  children  to graphic  sexual  ideas through  so-called  comprehensive  sexuality   education  programmes.  The  programmes  have erotic  components and  seek  to  influence  children  into  thinking  that  all  sexual behaviours and relationships  are  equally  valid.  

Secondly the  atheist  secular sexually  nihistic  and  sexually  anarchists  sextremists  are  using  the  United  Nations  to  create  a  categoriy  of  so-called  “sexual  rights”  to  which  children are  entitled.  This will  allow  children  to  restrict parental influence  over  children’s  behaviour.

The  video  below  shows  how  sexuality education is  preparing  children to  exercise  their  so-called  “sexual  rights”.

 

 

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/462604/We-can-t-prove-sex-with-children-does-them-harm-says-Labour-linked-NCCL

 

patricia-hewitt-462604

Patricia Hewitt described the NCCL as ‘Naive and WRONG’

PIE members were lobbying NCCL officials for the age of consent to be reduced and campaigning for “paedophile love”.

Their view that children were not harmed by having sex with adults appears to have been adopted by those at the top of the civil liberties group.

Today we publish extracts from an NCCL report written for the Criminal Law Revision Committee in 1976 when Mrs Hewitt was general secretary.

It says: “Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offence. As the age of consent is arbitrary, we propose an overlap of two years on either side of 14.

“Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult result in no identifiable damage.

“The Criminal Law Commission should be prepared to accept the evidence from follow-up research on child ‘victims’ which show there is little subsequent effect after a child has been ‘molested’.

“The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage.

“The present legal penalties are too high and reinforce the misinformation and prejudice. The duty of the court should be to inquire into all the relevant circumstances with the intention, not of meting out severe punishment, but of determining the best solution in the interests of both child and paedophile.”

Mrs Hewitt, 65, was general secretary between 1974 and 1983. After days of intense pressure, the former Labour MP for Leicester West finally admitted last week the NCCL was “naive and wrong” over its ties to PIE.

Where both partners are aged 10 or over, but under 14, a consenting sexual act should not be an offence
The NCCL Report
She said: “Any suggestion that I supported or condoned the vile crimes of child abusers is completely untrue.

“As the NCCL archives demonstrate, I consistently distinguished between consenting relationships between homosexual men, on the one hand, and the abuse of children on the other.

“When Jack Dromey, as NCCL chairman in 1976, vigorously opposed PIE at the NCCL AGM, he did so with the full support of the executive committee and myself as general secretary.”

However Labour MP Dromey’s opposition to PIE has been questioned by its former chairman, convicted paedophile Tom O’Carroll, who claims he felt “welcome” at NCCL meetings where he sat on the gay rights sub-committee.

Mr O’Carroll said: “While they did not like PIE and did nothing to support our objectives, they were afraid of appearing insufficiently ‘right on’.

“Consequently they were nothing like as strenuous and public in their efforts to distance themselves from PIE as they are now claiming.

“Dromey is quoted as saying ‘I was at the forefront of repeated public condemnations of PIE and their despicable views’. That’s news to me. Maybe by ‘public’ he meant imprecations muttered to cronies at his local pub.”

Dromey’s wife Harriet Harman, deputy leader of the Labour party, was legal officer at the NCCL between 1978 and 1982. She has expressed her “regret” over the NCCL’s involvement with PIE but has pointedly declined to apologise.

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in LGBT riights agenda, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s